{"title":"The crisis of democracy in Eastern Europe: (un)successful political integration of new members?","authors":"Dragana Č. Dabić","doi":"10.2298/MEDJP1902188D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main hypothesis of this paper is that when it comes to its member states,\n the European Union does not possess effective legal and political mechanisms\n to sanction and/or reverse their democratic backsliding. Emphasis is put on\n the examples of violations of liberal-democratic norms undertaken by\n governments in Hungary, Poland and Romania, in order to analyse political\n will, ability, and legitimacy of the European Union to defend basic values\n stated in the Founding Act. The aim of the author is to examine the impact\n of questionable political integration of Eastern European countries in\n regards to the continuation of the enlargement of the Union in the region of\n the Western Balkans. It is concluded that due to the pragmatic policy of\n support to the stabilitocracy regimes and, in general, due to the ambivalent\n attitude towards the future of enlargement, the European Union could face\n negative consequences in the coming years. Conceding to candidate countries\n in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria in exchange for meeting the current\n geopolitical interests of the European elites (as was the case in some of\n the earlier EU enlargements) would have following implications for the Union\n itself: first, internally, casting further doubts on already shaken\n credibility of the project to build a European identity based on common\n values; and secondly, externally, the loss of reputation of a normative\n power that facilitates global relations by spreading its own principles and\n values.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1902188D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The main hypothesis of this paper is that when it comes to its member states,
the European Union does not possess effective legal and political mechanisms
to sanction and/or reverse their democratic backsliding. Emphasis is put on
the examples of violations of liberal-democratic norms undertaken by
governments in Hungary, Poland and Romania, in order to analyse political
will, ability, and legitimacy of the European Union to defend basic values
stated in the Founding Act. The aim of the author is to examine the impact
of questionable political integration of Eastern European countries in
regards to the continuation of the enlargement of the Union in the region of
the Western Balkans. It is concluded that due to the pragmatic policy of
support to the stabilitocracy regimes and, in general, due to the ambivalent
attitude towards the future of enlargement, the European Union could face
negative consequences in the coming years. Conceding to candidate countries
in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria in exchange for meeting the current
geopolitical interests of the European elites (as was the case in some of
the earlier EU enlargements) would have following implications for the Union
itself: first, internally, casting further doubts on already shaken
credibility of the project to build a European identity based on common
values; and secondly, externally, the loss of reputation of a normative
power that facilitates global relations by spreading its own principles and
values.