The crisis of democracy in Eastern Europe: (un)successful political integration of new members?

Dragana Č. Dabić
{"title":"The crisis of democracy in Eastern Europe: (un)successful political integration of new members?","authors":"Dragana Č. Dabić","doi":"10.2298/MEDJP1902188D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main hypothesis of this paper is that when it comes to its member states,\n the European Union does not possess effective legal and political mechanisms\n to sanction and/or reverse their democratic backsliding. Emphasis is put on\n the examples of violations of liberal-democratic norms undertaken by\n governments in Hungary, Poland and Romania, in order to analyse political\n will, ability, and legitimacy of the European Union to defend basic values\n stated in the Founding Act. The aim of the author is to examine the impact\n of questionable political integration of Eastern European countries in\n regards to the continuation of the enlargement of the Union in the region of\n the Western Balkans. It is concluded that due to the pragmatic policy of\n support to the stabilitocracy regimes and, in general, due to the ambivalent\n attitude towards the future of enlargement, the European Union could face\n negative consequences in the coming years. Conceding to candidate countries\n in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria in exchange for meeting the current\n geopolitical interests of the European elites (as was the case in some of\n the earlier EU enlargements) would have following implications for the Union\n itself: first, internally, casting further doubts on already shaken\n credibility of the project to build a European identity based on common\n values; and secondly, externally, the loss of reputation of a normative\n power that facilitates global relations by spreading its own principles and\n values.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1902188D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main hypothesis of this paper is that when it comes to its member states, the European Union does not possess effective legal and political mechanisms to sanction and/or reverse their democratic backsliding. Emphasis is put on the examples of violations of liberal-democratic norms undertaken by governments in Hungary, Poland and Romania, in order to analyse political will, ability, and legitimacy of the European Union to defend basic values stated in the Founding Act. The aim of the author is to examine the impact of questionable political integration of Eastern European countries in regards to the continuation of the enlargement of the Union in the region of the Western Balkans. It is concluded that due to the pragmatic policy of support to the stabilitocracy regimes and, in general, due to the ambivalent attitude towards the future of enlargement, the European Union could face negative consequences in the coming years. Conceding to candidate countries in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria in exchange for meeting the current geopolitical interests of the European elites (as was the case in some of the earlier EU enlargements) would have following implications for the Union itself: first, internally, casting further doubts on already shaken credibility of the project to build a European identity based on common values; and secondly, externally, the loss of reputation of a normative power that facilitates global relations by spreading its own principles and values.
东欧的民主危机:(不)新成员国成功的政治融合?
本文的主要假设是,当涉及到其成员国时,欧盟没有有效的法律和政治机制来制裁和/或扭转其民主倒退。重点放在匈牙利、波兰和罗马尼亚政府违反自由民主规范的例子上,以分析欧盟捍卫《创始法案》中规定的基本价值观的政治意愿、能力和合法性。作者的目的是审查东欧国家可疑的政治一体化对欧盟在西巴尔干地区继续扩大的影响。结论是,由于支持稳定政权的务实政策,总体上,由于对扩大未来的矛盾态度,欧洲联盟在未来几年可能面临负面后果。在满足哥本哈根标准方面向候选国让步,以换取满足欧洲精英当前的地缘政治利益(就像欧盟早期的一些扩张一样),对欧盟本身将产生以下影响:首先,在内部,对基于共同价值观建立欧洲身份的计划已经动摇的可信度产生进一步的怀疑;其次,对外,一个通过传播自己的原则和价值观来促进全球关系的规范性大国的声誉丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信