Why Do Employees Participate in Employee Share Ownership Plans?

Michelle Brown, Rowan Minson, Ann O’Connell, I. Ramsay
{"title":"Why Do Employees Participate in Employee Share Ownership Plans?","authors":"Michelle Brown, Rowan Minson, Ann O’Connell, I. Ramsay","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1873802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employee share ownership in Australia has, until recently, been largely unchartered, despite considerable public policy interest in the area. Although empirical research has recently been undertaken into the current incidence and forms of broad-based employee share ownership plans (ESOPs) in Australia, and the motivations and objectives of employers in implementing them, the reasons why non-executive Australian employees elect or decline to participate in ESOPs remain unclear. Where shares or options are provided to employees as a ‘gift’, the answer may be considered comparatively straightforward but, in cases of contributory plans, do employees only participate when they perceive the company to be a good financial investment or do non-financial considerations such as the desire to take part in company decision-making also play a role? Are employees’ decisions influenced by their degree of commitment to their employer or are attitudes towards employee share ownership in general more important? What, moreover, is the significance of demographic factors such as age, gender and income? The answers to these questions have implications for corporate governance, human resource practice and public policy. This research report presents findings from a survey of employees at two major Australian companies with operating ESOPs. Part 2 of the report explains the background and methodology behind the survey. Parts 3 and 4 set out, respectively, the key characteristics of the sample and the basic results, while Part 5 directly tests the above questions.","PeriodicalId":368661,"journal":{"name":"University of Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1873802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Employee share ownership in Australia has, until recently, been largely unchartered, despite considerable public policy interest in the area. Although empirical research has recently been undertaken into the current incidence and forms of broad-based employee share ownership plans (ESOPs) in Australia, and the motivations and objectives of employers in implementing them, the reasons why non-executive Australian employees elect or decline to participate in ESOPs remain unclear. Where shares or options are provided to employees as a ‘gift’, the answer may be considered comparatively straightforward but, in cases of contributory plans, do employees only participate when they perceive the company to be a good financial investment or do non-financial considerations such as the desire to take part in company decision-making also play a role? Are employees’ decisions influenced by their degree of commitment to their employer or are attitudes towards employee share ownership in general more important? What, moreover, is the significance of demographic factors such as age, gender and income? The answers to these questions have implications for corporate governance, human resource practice and public policy. This research report presents findings from a survey of employees at two major Australian companies with operating ESOPs. Part 2 of the report explains the background and methodology behind the survey. Parts 3 and 4 set out, respectively, the key characteristics of the sample and the basic results, while Part 5 directly tests the above questions.
为什么员工要参与员工持股计划?
尽管澳大利亚的公共政策对这一领域有相当大的兴趣,但直到最近,雇员持股在很大程度上还是未知的。尽管最近对澳大利亚目前广泛的员工持股计划(ESOPs)的发生率和形式以及雇主实施这些计划的动机和目标进行了实证研究,但澳大利亚非执行员工选择或拒绝参与ESOPs的原因仍不清楚。当股票或期权作为“礼物”提供给员工时,答案可能被认为是相对简单的,但是,在缴款计划的情况下,员工是否只在他们认为公司是一项良好的财务投资时才参与,或者非财务考虑,如参与公司决策的愿望也起作用?员工的决定是受到他们对雇主的承诺程度的影响,还是对员工持股的态度总体上更重要?此外,年龄、性别和收入等人口因素的重要性是什么?这些问题的答案对公司治理、人力资源实践和公共政策都有影响。本研究报告介绍了对澳大利亚两家主要公司的员工进行调查的结果。报告的第二部分解释了调查的背景和方法。第3部分和第4部分分别列出了样本的关键特征和基本结果,第5部分直接测试了上述问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信