What does the Policy Formulation Process of East Lantau Metropolis and Lantau Tomorrow Vision Policy Imply Hong Kong Policy Style

P. Fung
{"title":"What does the Policy Formulation Process of East Lantau Metropolis and Lantau Tomorrow Vision Policy Imply Hong Kong Policy Style","authors":"P. Fung","doi":"10.22492/issn.2186-2303.2020.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"East Lantau Metropolis, a Hong Kong reclamation plan of 1,000 ha in the Central Waters, appeared to have reached consensus in a territory-wide consultation. However, the Government did not move forward to policy execution, but introduced a more aggressive and enhanced 1,7000 reclamation proposal of Lantau Tomorrow Vision. Such move received even more grievances in the divided and highly politicised community. The controversies of this issue can be seen and summarised 1) in terms of ideas that why the Government goes far beyond the perceived consensus reached and introduced a brand-new proposal, and 2) in terms of actors and institutions that what are the driving forces behind Lantau Tomorrow Vision. This paper explains and analyses this unconventional change in the policy process according to the four phases of policy formulation process as well as a key stakeholder analysis. Together with the consideration of the current governance in Hong Kong, the unique policy style in Hong Kong under \"One Country Two Systems\" is conceptualised – implying a conflicting mixture of Chines Authoritarian style and British Majoritarian Style. This policy style can also be understood and is applicable when looking into other salient issues and the long-lasting antiGovernment protest in the polarized society of today's Hong Kong.","PeriodicalId":405929,"journal":{"name":"– The Asian Conference on the Social Sciences 2020: Official Conference Proceedings","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"– The Asian Conference on the Social Sciences 2020: Official Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-2303.2020.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

East Lantau Metropolis, a Hong Kong reclamation plan of 1,000 ha in the Central Waters, appeared to have reached consensus in a territory-wide consultation. However, the Government did not move forward to policy execution, but introduced a more aggressive and enhanced 1,7000 reclamation proposal of Lantau Tomorrow Vision. Such move received even more grievances in the divided and highly politicised community. The controversies of this issue can be seen and summarised 1) in terms of ideas that why the Government goes far beyond the perceived consensus reached and introduced a brand-new proposal, and 2) in terms of actors and institutions that what are the driving forces behind Lantau Tomorrow Vision. This paper explains and analyses this unconventional change in the policy process according to the four phases of policy formulation process as well as a key stakeholder analysis. Together with the consideration of the current governance in Hong Kong, the unique policy style in Hong Kong under "One Country Two Systems" is conceptualised – implying a conflicting mixture of Chines Authoritarian style and British Majoritarian Style. This policy style can also be understood and is applicable when looking into other salient issues and the long-lasting antiGovernment protest in the polarized society of today's Hong Kong.
“东大屿都会”及“大屿明日愿景”政策的制定过程,对香港的政策风格有何启示
“东大屿山都会”是一项在中环水域填海一千公顷的计划,似乎已在全港公众谘询中达成共识。然而,政府并没有推进政策的执行,而是提出了一项更积极和更完善的“明日大屿愿景”的填海建议。这一举动在这个分裂和高度政治化的社区中引起了更多的不满。关于这个议题的争议,可以从以下两个方面看出和总结:(1)政府为何远超共识,提出全新的建议;(2)从行为者和机构来看,明日大屿愿景背后的推动力是什么。本文根据政策制定过程的四个阶段以及关键利益相关者分析来解释和分析这种政策过程中的非常规变化。结合香港目前的管治,对“一国两制”下香港独特的政策风格进行了概念化,即中国专制风格和英国多数主义风格的冲突混合。这种政策风格也可以理解并适用于当今香港两极分化社会的其他突出问题和长期的反政府抗议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信