Offensive Behavior and German Penal Law

Tatjana Höörnle
{"title":"Offensive Behavior and German Penal Law","authors":"Tatjana Höörnle","doi":"10.1525/NCLR.2001.5.1.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several provisions of the German Penal Code deal with conduct perceived to be intolerable and offensive. Punished are public sexual acts, dissemination of certain obnoxious kinds of pornography, (e.g., pornography with children), public display of pornography in general, and incest. Also offensive are abusive statements against minorities, denial of the Nazi genocide, insults against religious denominations, disturbance of religious ceremonies, mistreatments of dead bodies, and desecration of burial sites. Attempts to justify the prohibition of such behavior within the framework of contemporary German penal theory has led to difficulties. Most of these acts do not result in tangible harm to a specific person. In the absence of obvious damages, it is difficult to reconcile these parts of the German Penal Code with general principles concerning the proper range of the criminal law. The most straightforward explanation would simply point to the fact that the actor violated a moral rule. It would be easy to make that claim for most of the listed acts; their prohibition, indeed, is compatible with prevailing moral standards. Such a moral justification, however, runs contrary to the premises of modern German penal theory.","PeriodicalId":344882,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2001.5.1.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Several provisions of the German Penal Code deal with conduct perceived to be intolerable and offensive. Punished are public sexual acts, dissemination of certain obnoxious kinds of pornography, (e.g., pornography with children), public display of pornography in general, and incest. Also offensive are abusive statements against minorities, denial of the Nazi genocide, insults against religious denominations, disturbance of religious ceremonies, mistreatments of dead bodies, and desecration of burial sites. Attempts to justify the prohibition of such behavior within the framework of contemporary German penal theory has led to difficulties. Most of these acts do not result in tangible harm to a specific person. In the absence of obvious damages, it is difficult to reconcile these parts of the German Penal Code with general principles concerning the proper range of the criminal law. The most straightforward explanation would simply point to the fact that the actor violated a moral rule. It would be easy to make that claim for most of the listed acts; their prohibition, indeed, is compatible with prevailing moral standards. Such a moral justification, however, runs contrary to the premises of modern German penal theory.
冒犯行为与德国刑法
德国《刑法典》的若干条款涉及被认为是不可容忍和冒犯的行为。公共场所的性行为、传播某些令人讨厌的色情内容(例如,与儿童的色情内容)、公开展示一般的色情内容,以及乱伦,都将受到惩罚。对少数民族的侮辱性言论、否认纳粹种族灭绝、侮辱宗教派别、扰乱宗教仪式、虐待尸体和亵渎墓地也是令人反感的。试图在当代德国刑法理论的框架内为禁止这种行为辩护已经导致了困难。这些行为大多不会对特定的人造成有形的伤害。在没有明显损害赔偿的情况下,很难使《德国刑法典》的这些部分与关于刑法适当范围的一般原则相协调。最直接的解释就是行为人违反了道德准则。对于所列的大多数行为,我们很容易提出这样的主张;对它们的禁止,确实是符合普遍的道德标准的。然而,这种道德辩护与现代德国刑法理论的前提背道而驰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信