Analysis of Engineering Technology Students' Digital Footprints in Synchronous and Asynchronous Blended Courses

Philip Appiah Kubi, K. Zouhri, Emily Basile, Melissa McCabe
{"title":"Analysis of Engineering Technology Students' Digital Footprints in Synchronous and Asynchronous Blended Courses","authors":"Philip Appiah Kubi, K. Zouhri, Emily Basile, Melissa McCabe","doi":"10.3991/ijep.v12i1.24571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of Covid-19 provided an enormous academic and logistical challenge to almost all academic institutions in the United States and around the world. As a precautionary measure surrounding the novel coronavirus and in line with recommendations from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at that time (spring 2020), most higher education institutions in the United States shut down campuses and completed the second half of the spring 2020 semester virtually. During the fall 2020 semester, when relatively more was known about the virus, some institutions started with face-to-face classes but had to switch to virtual learning after noticing a spread of the coronavirus on their campuses. Others adopted a blended approach that supplements face-to-face meetings with virtual learning synchronously or asynchronously. Whichever approach adopted in place of the traditional face-to-face meetings did not necessarily solve the challenge faced by Engineering Technology programs, which typically infuse hands-on learning in most of the courses in their curriculum. Due to the applied nature of engineering technology, it is important to ensure that students stay engaged with creative ways to learn by doing. And to ensure that the students do not miss critical course content in virtual and blended engineering technology courses, it is vital that the students maintain high interactions with online resources such as class video recordings. This paper reviews students’ patterns of interactions with course videos to assess its impact on the academic success of engineering technology students in some upper-level blended courses delivered during the spring and fall 2020 semesters.","PeriodicalId":170699,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Eng. Pedagog.","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Eng. Pedagog.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v12i1.24571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The advent of Covid-19 provided an enormous academic and logistical challenge to almost all academic institutions in the United States and around the world. As a precautionary measure surrounding the novel coronavirus and in line with recommendations from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at that time (spring 2020), most higher education institutions in the United States shut down campuses and completed the second half of the spring 2020 semester virtually. During the fall 2020 semester, when relatively more was known about the virus, some institutions started with face-to-face classes but had to switch to virtual learning after noticing a spread of the coronavirus on their campuses. Others adopted a blended approach that supplements face-to-face meetings with virtual learning synchronously or asynchronously. Whichever approach adopted in place of the traditional face-to-face meetings did not necessarily solve the challenge faced by Engineering Technology programs, which typically infuse hands-on learning in most of the courses in their curriculum. Due to the applied nature of engineering technology, it is important to ensure that students stay engaged with creative ways to learn by doing. And to ensure that the students do not miss critical course content in virtual and blended engineering technology courses, it is vital that the students maintain high interactions with online resources such as class video recordings. This paper reviews students’ patterns of interactions with course videos to assess its impact on the academic success of engineering technology students in some upper-level blended courses delivered during the spring and fall 2020 semesters.
同步与异步混合课程中工科学生的数字足迹分析
新冠肺炎的出现给美国和世界各地几乎所有学术机构带来了巨大的学术和后勤挑战。作为针对新型冠状病毒的预防措施,根据当时(2020年春季)美国疾病控制与预防中心的建议,美国大多数高等教育机构关闭了校园,基本完成了2020年春季学期的下半学期。在2020年秋季学期,当人们对这种病毒的了解相对更多时,一些机构开始采用面对面的课程,但在注意到冠状病毒在校园内传播后,不得不转向虚拟学习。其他人则采用了混合的方法,以同步或异步的虚拟学习方式补充面对面的会议。无论采用哪种方法来代替传统的面对面会议,都不一定能解决工程技术项目所面临的挑战,因为工程技术项目通常在课程的大部分课程中都融入了实践学习。由于工程技术的应用性质,确保学生在实践中学习的创造性方法是很重要的。为了确保学生不会错过虚拟和混合工程技术课程中的关键课程内容,学生与课堂视频记录等在线资源保持高度互动至关重要。本文回顾了学生与课程视频的互动模式,以评估其对工程技术学生在2020年春季和秋季学期交付的一些高级混合课程中的学业成功的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信