Comparative study of efficacy of oral iron versus parenteral iron in the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia

M. E. Hossain, H. Mahfuz, M. Uddin, Mostafil Karim
{"title":"Comparative study of efficacy of oral iron versus parenteral iron in the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia","authors":"M. E. Hossain, H. Mahfuz, M. Uddin, Mostafil Karim","doi":"10.37545/haematoljbd202281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is one of the most widespread nutritional deficiency and common medical conditions seen in everyday clinical practice. IDA has a substantial haematological complication with potentially serious clinical consequences that often may require iron therapy. In most patients, body stores of iron can be restored by oral iron therapy but parenteral iron therapy results rapid correction of haemoglobin levels, faster and higher replenishment of iron stores with better compliance. The study was to compare the efficacy of oral iron (ferrous sulphate) with parenteral iron (iron sucrose) to treat iron deficiency anaemia. Methods: 221 patients were included in the study. 101 patients were given oral iron in the form of ferrous sulphate containing 67 mg of elemental iron three times daily. 120 patients were treated with iron sucrose.  After a 25 mg test dose on the first infusion only, this was given at a dose of 300 mg by intravenous infusion diluted in 250 ml of normal saline, every alternate day. Haemoglobin level and serum ferritin of both groups were done before iron therapy, 3 weeks and 12 weeks after iron therapy. Results: The mean±SD rise of haemoglobin concentration 3 weeks after iron therapy in iron sucrose group was 11.2±0.60 g/dL, while in ferrous sulphate group was 9.0±0.58 g/dL. The mean±SD ferritin 3 weeks after iron therapy in iron sucrose group was 81.0±15.18 ng/mL, while in ferrous sulphate group was 27.0±12.22 ng/mL. The mean±SD haemoglobin concentration 12 weeks after iron therapy in iron sucrose group was 12.2±0.60 g/dL, while in ferrous sulphate group was 11.0±0.58 g/dL. The mean±SD ferritin 12 weeks after iron therapy in iron sucrose group was 82.0±16.17 ng/mL, while in ferrous sulphate group was 52.0±12.22 ng/mL. No serious adverse events were reported in either the ferrous sulphate group or iron sucrose group. Conclusion: Iron sucrose causes higher rise in haemoglobin level and serum ferritin as compared to oral iron therapy.","PeriodicalId":137283,"journal":{"name":"Haematology Journal of Bangladesh","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematology Journal of Bangladesh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37545/haematoljbd202281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is one of the most widespread nutritional deficiency and common medical conditions seen in everyday clinical practice. IDA has a substantial haematological complication with potentially serious clinical consequences that often may require iron therapy. In most patients, body stores of iron can be restored by oral iron therapy but parenteral iron therapy results rapid correction of haemoglobin levels, faster and higher replenishment of iron stores with better compliance. The study was to compare the efficacy of oral iron (ferrous sulphate) with parenteral iron (iron sucrose) to treat iron deficiency anaemia. Methods: 221 patients were included in the study. 101 patients were given oral iron in the form of ferrous sulphate containing 67 mg of elemental iron three times daily. 120 patients were treated with iron sucrose.  After a 25 mg test dose on the first infusion only, this was given at a dose of 300 mg by intravenous infusion diluted in 250 ml of normal saline, every alternate day. Haemoglobin level and serum ferritin of both groups were done before iron therapy, 3 weeks and 12 weeks after iron therapy. Results: The mean±SD rise of haemoglobin concentration 3 weeks after iron therapy in iron sucrose group was 11.2±0.60 g/dL, while in ferrous sulphate group was 9.0±0.58 g/dL. The mean±SD ferritin 3 weeks after iron therapy in iron sucrose group was 81.0±15.18 ng/mL, while in ferrous sulphate group was 27.0±12.22 ng/mL. The mean±SD haemoglobin concentration 12 weeks after iron therapy in iron sucrose group was 12.2±0.60 g/dL, while in ferrous sulphate group was 11.0±0.58 g/dL. The mean±SD ferritin 12 weeks after iron therapy in iron sucrose group was 82.0±16.17 ng/mL, while in ferrous sulphate group was 52.0±12.22 ng/mL. No serious adverse events were reported in either the ferrous sulphate group or iron sucrose group. Conclusion: Iron sucrose causes higher rise in haemoglobin level and serum ferritin as compared to oral iron therapy.
口服铁与肠外铁治疗缺铁性贫血疗效的比较研究
背景:缺铁性贫血(IDA)是最普遍的营养缺乏症之一,也是日常临床实践中常见的医疗状况。IDA有大量的血液学并发症,具有潜在的严重临床后果,通常可能需要铁治疗。在大多数患者中,通过口服铁治疗可以恢复体内的铁储备,但肠外铁治疗可以快速纠正血红蛋白水平,更快、更高地补充铁储备,并且依从性更好。该研究旨在比较口服铁(硫酸亚铁)与肠外铁(蔗糖铁)治疗缺铁性贫血的疗效。方法:221例患者纳入研究。101例患者口服含67毫克单质铁的硫酸亚铁,每日三次。120例患者接受蔗糖铁治疗。仅在第一次输注25毫克试验剂量后,每隔一天以300毫克的剂量静脉输注,稀释在250毫升生理盐水中。两组患者在铁治疗前、铁治疗后3周和12周分别测定血红蛋白和血清铁蛋白水平。结果:铁治疗3周后,蔗糖铁组血红蛋白浓度平均±SD升高11.2±0.60 g/dL,硫酸亚铁组血红蛋白浓度平均±SD升高9.0±0.58 g/dL。铁治疗3周后,蔗糖铁组铁蛋白平均值±SD为81.0±15.18 ng/mL,硫酸亚铁组铁蛋白平均值为27.0±12.22 ng/mL。铁治疗后12周,蔗糖铁组血红蛋白平均±SD浓度为12.2±0.60 g/dL,硫酸亚铁组为11.0±0.58 g/dL。铁治疗12周后,蔗糖铁组铁蛋白平均值±SD为82.0±16.17 ng/mL,硫酸亚铁组铁蛋白平均值为52.0±12.22 ng/mL。硫酸亚铁组和蔗糖铁组均未报告严重不良事件。结论:与口服铁治疗相比,蔗糖铁可引起血红蛋白水平和血清铁蛋白升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信