THE INFLUENCE OF LEARNING STRATEGIES AND LOGICAL THINKING SKILLS ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AND ETHICS

Nurasyiah, Candra Wijaya, Syamsu Nahar
{"title":"THE INFLUENCE OF LEARNING STRATEGIES AND LOGICAL THINKING SKILLS ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AND ETHICS","authors":"Nurasyiah, Candra Wijaya, Syamsu Nahar","doi":"10.47006/ijierm.v3i3.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: the purpose of this study was to determine: (1) student learning outcomes taught by inquiry learning strategies and student learning outcomes taught using advanced organizer learning, (2) PAI learning outcomes and character about faraid students who have high logical thinking skills and students. who have low logical thinking skills, and (3) the interaction between learning strategies and students' logical thinking skills on the learning outcomes of Islamic Education and Characteristics about faraid. The study population was all students of class XI SMKN 1 North Region consisting of 2 classes. The sample chosen to be the inquiry learning class is class XI-1 and class XI-2 as the advanced organizer learning class. The sampling technique in this study was a cluster random sampling technique. The analysis varians technique was two-way at a significance level of x = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results of the study were: (1) the average learning outcomes of Islamic education and character about faraid students who were taught with inquiry learning strategies (= 28.35) were higher than the average learning outcomes of Islamic education and character about faraid students who were taught with strategies learning advanced organizer (= 26.97) with Fcount = 29.56> Ftable = 3.968,  (2) the average Islamic education learning outcomes and character about students with high logical thinking abilities (= 30) were higher than the PAI learning outcomes and Characteristics about students with low logical thinking skills (= 26.06), with Fcount = 4.47> Ftable = 3,968, and (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and logical thinking skills with Fcount = 9.88> Ftable = 3,968. The results of data analysis concluded that students with the characteristics of high logical thinking skills, the appropriate learning strategy to use was inquiry learning strategies and students with low logical thinking characteristics, the appropriate learning strategy to use was the advanced organizer learning strategy. The implications of this study are specifically targeted at the teaching staff.","PeriodicalId":391017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47006/ijierm.v3i3.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: the purpose of this study was to determine: (1) student learning outcomes taught by inquiry learning strategies and student learning outcomes taught using advanced organizer learning, (2) PAI learning outcomes and character about faraid students who have high logical thinking skills and students. who have low logical thinking skills, and (3) the interaction between learning strategies and students' logical thinking skills on the learning outcomes of Islamic Education and Characteristics about faraid. The study population was all students of class XI SMKN 1 North Region consisting of 2 classes. The sample chosen to be the inquiry learning class is class XI-1 and class XI-2 as the advanced organizer learning class. The sampling technique in this study was a cluster random sampling technique. The analysis varians technique was two-way at a significance level of x = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results of the study were: (1) the average learning outcomes of Islamic education and character about faraid students who were taught with inquiry learning strategies (= 28.35) were higher than the average learning outcomes of Islamic education and character about faraid students who were taught with strategies learning advanced organizer (= 26.97) with Fcount = 29.56> Ftable = 3.968,  (2) the average Islamic education learning outcomes and character about students with high logical thinking abilities (= 30) were higher than the PAI learning outcomes and Characteristics about students with low logical thinking skills (= 26.06), with Fcount = 4.47> Ftable = 3,968, and (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and logical thinking skills with Fcount = 9.88> Ftable = 3,968. The results of data analysis concluded that students with the characteristics of high logical thinking skills, the appropriate learning strategy to use was inquiry learning strategies and students with low logical thinking characteristics, the appropriate learning strategy to use was the advanced organizer learning strategy. The implications of this study are specifically targeted at the teaching staff.
学习策略与逻辑思维能力对伊斯兰教宗教教育与伦理学习成果的影响
摘要:本研究的目的是确定:(1)探究性学习策略教学的学生学习成果和高级组织学习的学生学习成果;(2)高逻辑思维能力的贫困学生和学生的PAI学习成果和特征。(3)学习策略与学生逻辑思维能力对伊斯兰教育学习成果和faraid特点的交互作用。本研究的抽样技术为整群随机抽样技术。分析变量技术在显著性水平x = 0.05下为双向,然后进行Scheffe检验。研究结果如下:(1)研究性学习策略组学生伊斯兰教育和品格的平均学习成果(= 28.35)高于高级组织者策略组学生伊斯兰教育和品格的平均学习成果(= 26.97)(Fcount = 29.56 bb0 Ftable = 3.968);(2)逻辑思维能力高的学生伊斯兰教育的平均学习成果和品格的平均学习成果(= 30)更高(3)学习策略与逻辑思维技能之间存在交互作用,Fcount = 9.88> Ftable = 3968。数据分析结果表明,逻辑思维能力高的学生适合使用探究性学习策略,逻辑思维能力低的学生适合使用高级组织者学习策略。本研究的意义是专门针对教学人员的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信