{"title":"Evidence theory of normal possibility and its application","authors":"H. Tanaka, H. Ishibuchi","doi":"10.1109/FUZZY.1992.258679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors construct a framework of evidence theory by normal possibility distributions defined as exponential functions. A possibility distribution is regarded as an evidence. A rule of combination of evidences is given with the same concept as Dempster's rule (see A. P. Dempster, 1967). Also, measures of ignorance and fuzziness of an evidence are defined by a normality factor and an area of a possibility distribution, respectively. Marginal and conditional possibilities are defined from a joint possibility distribution and it is shown that these three definitions are well matched to each other. Thus, the posterior possibility is derived from the prior possibility in the same form as Bayes's formula. Operations of fuzzy vectors defined by multidimensional possibility distributions are well formulated. Comments on an application of possibility distributions are given for discriminant analysis using fuzzy if-then rules.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":222263,"journal":{"name":"[1992 Proceedings] IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1992 Proceedings] IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1992.258679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The authors construct a framework of evidence theory by normal possibility distributions defined as exponential functions. A possibility distribution is regarded as an evidence. A rule of combination of evidences is given with the same concept as Dempster's rule (see A. P. Dempster, 1967). Also, measures of ignorance and fuzziness of an evidence are defined by a normality factor and an area of a possibility distribution, respectively. Marginal and conditional possibilities are defined from a joint possibility distribution and it is shown that these three definitions are well matched to each other. Thus, the posterior possibility is derived from the prior possibility in the same form as Bayes's formula. Operations of fuzzy vectors defined by multidimensional possibility distributions are well formulated. Comments on an application of possibility distributions are given for discriminant analysis using fuzzy if-then rules.<>
作者用指数函数定义的正态可能性分布构造了一个证据理论框架。可能性分布被视为证据。证据组合规则的概念与Dempster规则相同(参见A. P. Dempster, 1967)。此外,证据的无知和模糊的度量分别由正态性因子和可能性分布的面积来定义。从联合可能性分布中定义了边际可能性和条件可能性,并证明了这三种定义相互之间很好地匹配。因此,后验可能性是由先验可能性导出的,形式与贝叶斯公式相同。由多维可能性分布定义的模糊向量的运算得到了很好的表述。讨论了可能性分布在模糊if-then规则判别分析中的应用。