Strategic guidelines of scientific and pedagogical workers professional development in the conditions of open education

L. Petrenko
{"title":"Strategic guidelines of scientific and pedagogical workers professional development in the conditions of open education","authors":"L. Petrenko","doi":"10.32405/2218-7650-2020-13(42)-170-184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The article highlights the theoretically significant issue of professional development of research and teaching staff in terms of the open education. The author analyzes the legal and analytical materials on the implementation of the open education in the European and national educational space. The concept of the «open education» was explicated by being based on the study of scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists, which resulted into the conclusion of the reflection of various scientific views in these definitions – philosophical and pedagogical, informational and technological, didactic, based on which each of the new interpretations reveal some certain qualities, functions, characteristics, of the traditional education system into a conceptual model of new education, based on such methodological approaches as synergetic, systemic, culturological, axiological and basic principles: openness, flexibility, mobility, dynamism, advanced learning. Based on the results of studying the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists, analytical materials, the author identified a number of strategic guidelines for the professional development of research and teaching staff in terms of the open education. Their generalization is of practical importance against the background of the development of trends in European and domestic educational systems – globalization, internationalization and formation of the post‐industrial economy. The strategic guidelines of professional development of scientific and pedagogical workers in the conditions of open education presented in the article can be the basis of advanced training development program, selection of the maintenance of training, modeling of various competences and professional culture.","PeriodicalId":127206,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Postgraduate Education (Series «Educational sciences»)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Postgraduate Education (Series «Educational sciences»)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32405/2218-7650-2020-13(42)-170-184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The article highlights the theoretically significant issue of professional development of research and teaching staff in terms of the open education. The author analyzes the legal and analytical materials on the implementation of the open education in the European and national educational space. The concept of the «open education» was explicated by being based on the study of scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists, which resulted into the conclusion of the reflection of various scientific views in these definitions – philosophical and pedagogical, informational and technological, didactic, based on which each of the new interpretations reveal some certain qualities, functions, characteristics, of the traditional education system into a conceptual model of new education, based on such methodological approaches as synergetic, systemic, culturological, axiological and basic principles: openness, flexibility, mobility, dynamism, advanced learning. Based on the results of studying the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists, analytical materials, the author identified a number of strategic guidelines for the professional development of research and teaching staff in terms of the open education. Their generalization is of practical importance against the background of the development of trends in European and domestic educational systems – globalization, internationalization and formation of the post‐industrial economy. The strategic guidelines of professional development of scientific and pedagogical workers in the conditions of open education presented in the article can be the basis of advanced training development program, selection of the maintenance of training, modeling of various competences and professional culture.
开放教育条件下科学教育工作者专业发展的战略导向
. 文章强调了开放教育中科研与教学人员专业发展的理论意义。笔者对开放教育在欧洲和各国教育空间实施的法律和分析资料进行了分析。“开放教育”的概念是通过对国内外科学家的科学著作的研究来阐明的,这导致了在这些定义中反映各种科学观点的结论-哲学和教育学,信息和技术,教学,在此基础上,每一种新的解释都揭示了传统教育系统的某些品质,功能和特征,成为新教育的概念模型。基于协同的、系统的、文化的、价值论的方法论和基本原则:开放性、灵活性、流动性、动态性、高级性。本文在对国内外科学家的科学著作、分析资料进行研究的基础上,提出了开放教育条件下科研和教学人员专业发展的若干战略指导方针。在欧洲和国内教育体系的发展趋势——全球化、国际化和后工业经济的形成的背景下,它们的概括具有现实意义。本文提出的开放教育条件下科技工作者专业发展的战略指导方针可以作为高级培训发展计划、培训维护选择、各种能力塑造和专业文化塑造的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信