A. P. Ogurtsov about the humanitarian-anthropological turn

V. Rozin
{"title":"A. P. Ogurtsov about the humanitarian-anthropological turn","authors":"V. Rozin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2022-37-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the concept of the humanitarian-anthropological turn formulated by the famous Russian philosopher Alexander Pavlovich Ogurtsov. He analyzes Dilthey's views, showing that he is not only the initiator of humanitarian discourse, but, in fact, is developing a new direction of philosophy alternative to the natural science approach. The author analyzes the situation that necessitated the development of this direction, as well as the concepts of \"life\", \"history\", \"understanding\", \"expression\" and \"experience\", which Dilthey puts at the basis of his philosophical system.\n He shows that the essential feature of these concepts is a double modality. On the one hand, history (respectively, life, understanding, expression, experience) is “singular”, that is, it changes not according to some law, but due to random circumstances, on the other hand, life changes quite lawfully, under the influence of the mechanisms of culture, language , economics, relationships between people, technology. Dilthey's interest in a holistic analysis of life is explained. The author shows that within the framework of humanitarian and anthropological study, the integrity of life is determined by a number of factors: the problem that the researcher solves, the narratives and texts available to him, the methodology of humanitarian knowledge. In other humanitarian studies, these factors will change, and therefore the integrity of life will also change. It turns out that the integrity of life, over which Dilthey struggled, is not independent of the researcher, his personality and life, it is constituted in the very process of humanitarian knowledge, partly as a singular, partly natural phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox. Philosophical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2022-37-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the concept of the humanitarian-anthropological turn formulated by the famous Russian philosopher Alexander Pavlovich Ogurtsov. He analyzes Dilthey's views, showing that he is not only the initiator of humanitarian discourse, but, in fact, is developing a new direction of philosophy alternative to the natural science approach. The author analyzes the situation that necessitated the development of this direction, as well as the concepts of "life", "history", "understanding", "expression" and "experience", which Dilthey puts at the basis of his philosophical system. He shows that the essential feature of these concepts is a double modality. On the one hand, history (respectively, life, understanding, expression, experience) is “singular”, that is, it changes not according to some law, but due to random circumstances, on the other hand, life changes quite lawfully, under the influence of the mechanisms of culture, language , economics, relationships between people, technology. Dilthey's interest in a holistic analysis of life is explained. The author shows that within the framework of humanitarian and anthropological study, the integrity of life is determined by a number of factors: the problem that the researcher solves, the narratives and texts available to him, the methodology of humanitarian knowledge. In other humanitarian studies, these factors will change, and therefore the integrity of life will also change. It turns out that the integrity of life, over which Dilthey struggled, is not independent of the researcher, his personality and life, it is constituted in the very process of humanitarian knowledge, partly as a singular, partly natural phenomenon.
a.p. Ogurtsov关于人道主义-人类学的转变
本文论述了俄罗斯著名哲学家奥古尔佐夫提出的人道主义-人类学转向的概念。他分析了狄尔泰的观点,表明他不仅是人道主义话语的开创者,而且实际上正在发展一种替代自然科学方法的哲学新方向。作者分析了需要这一方向发展的形势,以及狄尔泰作为其哲学体系基础的“生活”、“历史”、“理解”、“表达”和“经验”等概念。他指出,这些概念的本质特征是双重模态。一方面,历史(分别是生活、理解、表达、经验)是“奇异的”,也就是说,它不是按照某种规律变化的,而是由于随机的情况而变化的;另一方面,在文化、语言、经济、人际关系、技术等机制的影响下,生活的变化是相当有规律的。狄尔泰对生命整体分析的兴趣得到了解释。作者指出,在人道主义和人类学研究的框架内,生命的完整性是由若干因素决定的:研究者解决的问题、他所能得到的叙述和文本、人道主义知识的方法论。在其他人道主义研究中,这些因素会改变,因此生命的完整性也会改变。事实证明,狄尔泰为之奋斗的生命的完整性并非独立于研究者、他的人格和生活之外,它是在人道主义知识的过程中构成的,部分是一种独特的、部分是自然现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信