Cartels Destroy Productivity: Evidence from the New Deal Sugar Manufacturing Cartel, 1934-74*

Staff Report Pub Date : 2015-10-31 DOI:10.21034/sr.519
Benjamin Bridgman, Shi Qi, James A. Schmitz
{"title":"Cartels Destroy Productivity: Evidence from the New Deal Sugar Manufacturing Cartel, 1934-74*","authors":"Benjamin Bridgman, Shi Qi, James A. Schmitz","doi":"10.21034/sr.519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea that cartels might reduce industry productivity by misallocating production from high to low productivity producers is as old as Adam. However, the study of the economic consequences of cartels has almost exclusively focused on the losses from higher prices (i.e., Harberger triangles). Yet, as the old idea suggests, we show that the rules for quotas and side payments in the New Deal sugar cartel led to significant misallocation of production. The resulting productivity declines essentially destroyed the entire cartel profit. The magnitude of the deadweight losses (relative to value added) was large: we estimate a lower bound for the losses equal to 25 percent and 42 percent in the beet and cane industries, respecttively.","PeriodicalId":164493,"journal":{"name":"Staff Report","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Staff Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21034/sr.519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The idea that cartels might reduce industry productivity by misallocating production from high to low productivity producers is as old as Adam. However, the study of the economic consequences of cartels has almost exclusively focused on the losses from higher prices (i.e., Harberger triangles). Yet, as the old idea suggests, we show that the rules for quotas and side payments in the New Deal sugar cartel led to significant misallocation of production. The resulting productivity declines essentially destroyed the entire cartel profit. The magnitude of the deadweight losses (relative to value added) was large: we estimate a lower bound for the losses equal to 25 percent and 42 percent in the beet and cane industries, respecttively.
卡特尔破坏生产力:来自新政制糖业卡特尔的证据,1934- 1974年*
卡特尔可能会通过将产量从生产率高的生产商错配到生产率低的生产商而降低行业生产率,这种观点与亚当一样古老。然而,对卡特尔经济后果的研究几乎完全集中在价格上涨带来的损失上(即哈伯格三角)。然而,正如旧观点所暗示的那样,我们表明,新政(New Deal)中食糖卡特尔的配额和附带支付规则导致了严重的生产分配不当。由此导致的生产率下降基本上摧毁了整个卡特尔的利润。无谓损失的幅度(相对于增加值)很大:我们估计损失的下限分别等于甜菜和甘蔗工业的25%和42%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信