Web content readability evaluation using fuzzy logic

Nawal Iram, Shareena Zafar, Rida Zahra
{"title":"Web content readability evaluation using fuzzy logic","authors":"Nawal Iram, Shareena Zafar, Rida Zahra","doi":"10.1109/ICACS.2018.8333281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The blogs, websites, clicks, and search keywords return web pages with a massive amount of textual content. Many of those are not readable to the users; readability being the extent to which user can understand the content. This study is to evaluate the readability using the fuzzy logic values based on some evaluation Criteria/Attributes. The Criteria would be the basic needs or conditions that are to be fulfilled in content for it to be readable enough to average users. These may include characters per word, syllables per word, words per sentence, sentences per paragraph, number of hard words, sentence complexity, sub-headings, spacing, fonts, and colors used, etc. Readability assessment would be done by rating its quality with the values of linguistic variables (i.e., good, poor, or acceptable, etc.) provided with the conditions/rules/criteria as parameters to evaluate readability. However, the exact description of such attributes is to be on users' grade level and search engines' demands but still their distinction is subjective to be unclear. Hence we decided to use these as attributes to fuzzy logic for a better approximate confinement of partial correspondence of them with fuzzy rules.","PeriodicalId":128949,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACS.2018.8333281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The blogs, websites, clicks, and search keywords return web pages with a massive amount of textual content. Many of those are not readable to the users; readability being the extent to which user can understand the content. This study is to evaluate the readability using the fuzzy logic values based on some evaluation Criteria/Attributes. The Criteria would be the basic needs or conditions that are to be fulfilled in content for it to be readable enough to average users. These may include characters per word, syllables per word, words per sentence, sentences per paragraph, number of hard words, sentence complexity, sub-headings, spacing, fonts, and colors used, etc. Readability assessment would be done by rating its quality with the values of linguistic variables (i.e., good, poor, or acceptable, etc.) provided with the conditions/rules/criteria as parameters to evaluate readability. However, the exact description of such attributes is to be on users' grade level and search engines' demands but still their distinction is subjective to be unclear. Hence we decided to use these as attributes to fuzzy logic for a better approximate confinement of partial correspondence of them with fuzzy rules.
基于模糊逻辑的网页内容可读性评价
博客、网站、点击和搜索关键词返回的网页包含大量的文本内容。其中许多对用户来说是不可读的;可读性是指用户能够理解内容的程度。本研究是基于一些评价标准/属性,利用模糊逻辑值对文章的可读性进行评价。标准将是内容中要满足的基本需求或条件,以使其对普通用户具有足够的可读性。这些指标可能包括每个单词的字符数、每个单词的音节数、每个句子的单词数、每个段落的句子数、句子的复杂程度、副标题、间距、字体和使用的颜色等。可读性评估将通过以条件/规则/标准作为可读性评估参数提供的语言变量值(即好、差或可接受等)对其质量进行评级来完成。然而,这些属性的确切描述是基于用户的等级水平和搜索引擎的需求,但它们的区别仍然是主观的,不明确。因此,我们决定使用这些属性作为模糊逻辑的属性,以便更好地近似限制它们与模糊规则的部分对应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信