Local Dependence and Guarding

J. V. Benthem, B. T. Cate, R. Koudijs
{"title":"Local Dependence and Guarding","authors":"J. V. Benthem, B. T. Cate, R. Koudijs","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2206.06046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study LFD, a base logic of functional dependence introduced by Baltag and van Benthem (2021) and its connections with the guarded fragment GF of first-order logic. Like other logics of dependence, the semantics of LFD uses teams: sets of permissible variable assignments. What sets LFD apart is its ability to express local dependence between variables and local dependence of statements on variables. Known features of LFD include decidability, explicit axiomatization, finite model property, and a bisimulation characterization. Others, including the complexity of satisfiability, remained open so far. More generally, what has been lacking is a good understanding of what makes the LFD approach to dependence computationally well-behaved, and how it relates to other decidable logics. In particular, how do allowing variable dependencies and guarding quantifiers compare as logical devices? We provide a new compositional translation from GF into LFD, and conversely, we translate LFD into GF in an `almost compositional' manner. Using these two translations, we transfer known results about GF to LFD in a uniform manner, yielding, e.g., tight complexity bounds for LFD satisfiability, as well as Craig interpolation. Conversely, e.g., the finite model property of LFD transfers to GF. Thus, local dependence and guarding turn out to be intricately entangled notions.","PeriodicalId":129696,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Modal Logic","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Modal Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.06046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study LFD, a base logic of functional dependence introduced by Baltag and van Benthem (2021) and its connections with the guarded fragment GF of first-order logic. Like other logics of dependence, the semantics of LFD uses teams: sets of permissible variable assignments. What sets LFD apart is its ability to express local dependence between variables and local dependence of statements on variables. Known features of LFD include decidability, explicit axiomatization, finite model property, and a bisimulation characterization. Others, including the complexity of satisfiability, remained open so far. More generally, what has been lacking is a good understanding of what makes the LFD approach to dependence computationally well-behaved, and how it relates to other decidable logics. In particular, how do allowing variable dependencies and guarding quantifiers compare as logical devices? We provide a new compositional translation from GF into LFD, and conversely, we translate LFD into GF in an `almost compositional' manner. Using these two translations, we transfer known results about GF to LFD in a uniform manner, yielding, e.g., tight complexity bounds for LFD satisfiability, as well as Craig interpolation. Conversely, e.g., the finite model property of LFD transfers to GF. Thus, local dependence and guarding turn out to be intricately entangled notions.
局部依赖与保护
我们研究了Baltag和van Benthem(2021)引入的功能依赖基础逻辑LFD及其与一阶逻辑的保护片段GF的联系。与其他依赖逻辑一样,LFD的语义使用团队:一组允许的变量赋值。使LFD与众不同的是它能够表达变量之间的局部依赖性和语句对变量的局部依赖性。已知的LFD的特征包括可决性、显式公理化、有限模型性质和双模拟表征。其他的,包括满意度的复杂性,到目前为止仍然是开放的。更一般地说,一直缺乏的是对是什么使LFD方法在计算上表现良好,以及它如何与其他可决定逻辑相关联的良好理解。特别是,如何将允许变量依赖和保护量词作为逻辑设备进行比较?我们提供了一种新的从GF到LFD的组合翻译,反过来,我们以一种“几乎组合”的方式将LFD翻译成GF。使用这两种转换,我们以统一的方式将关于GF的已知结果转移到LFD,从而得到LFD可满足性的紧复杂度界,以及克雷格插值。相反,例如,LFD的有限模型性质转移到GF。因此,局部依赖与保护是一个错综复杂的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信