ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE DEPOSIT BANKING SECTOR IN THE COVID-19 PERIOD WITH LMAW-DNMA METHODS

Gulay Demir
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE DEPOSIT BANKING SECTOR IN THE COVID-19 PERIOD WITH LMAW-DNMA METHODS","authors":"Gulay Demir","doi":"10.52898/ijif.2022.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banks, as one of the most important actors in the money and capital markets, play a critical role in the financial intermediation process for every country’s economy. The deposit banking sector is critical to the banking system’s effective and efficient operation. The goal of this research is to develop a multi-criteria model for measuring and assessing the performance of the deposit banking sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, an integrated model consisting of the Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) and Double Normalization-based Multiple Aggregation (DNMA) methods is proposed. In the first stage of the proposed performance evaluation model, the performance indicators determined based on the previous literature were weighted with the LMAW method. In the second stage, the DNMA method was used to measure and evaluate the financial performance of the deposit banking sector during the COVID-19 pandemic period. In this context, an integrated model consisting of the Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) and Double Normalization-based Multiple Aggregation (DNMA) methods are proposed. In the first stage of the proposed performance evaluation model, the performance indicators determined based on the previous literature were weighted with the LMAW method. In the second stage, the DNMA method was used to measure and evaluate the financial performance of the deposit banking sector during the COVID-19 pandemic period. When the DNMA ranking findings were analyzed generally, it was determined that the deposit banking sector was severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This suggests that the sector is inefficient at managing pandemic-related risks. This study’s findings may assist bank management, investors, and regulatory and supervisory agencies in making more accurate decisions regarding the stability of the banking system. Various sensitivity analyses were also utilized to verify the model’s dependability and robustness within the scope of the study. The results of sensitivity analyses indicate that the suggested methodology generates consistent and reliable sequencing outcomes.","PeriodicalId":107863,"journal":{"name":"Sivas Soft Bilisim Proje Danismanlik Egitim Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sivas Soft Bilisim Proje Danismanlik Egitim Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52898/ijif.2022.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Banks, as one of the most important actors in the money and capital markets, play a critical role in the financial intermediation process for every country’s economy. The deposit banking sector is critical to the banking system’s effective and efficient operation. The goal of this research is to develop a multi-criteria model for measuring and assessing the performance of the deposit banking sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, an integrated model consisting of the Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) and Double Normalization-based Multiple Aggregation (DNMA) methods is proposed. In the first stage of the proposed performance evaluation model, the performance indicators determined based on the previous literature were weighted with the LMAW method. In the second stage, the DNMA method was used to measure and evaluate the financial performance of the deposit banking sector during the COVID-19 pandemic period. In this context, an integrated model consisting of the Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) and Double Normalization-based Multiple Aggregation (DNMA) methods are proposed. In the first stage of the proposed performance evaluation model, the performance indicators determined based on the previous literature were weighted with the LMAW method. In the second stage, the DNMA method was used to measure and evaluate the financial performance of the deposit banking sector during the COVID-19 pandemic period. When the DNMA ranking findings were analyzed generally, it was determined that the deposit banking sector was severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This suggests that the sector is inefficient at managing pandemic-related risks. This study’s findings may assist bank management, investors, and regulatory and supervisory agencies in making more accurate decisions regarding the stability of the banking system. Various sensitivity analyses were also utilized to verify the model’s dependability and robustness within the scope of the study. The results of sensitivity analyses indicate that the suggested methodology generates consistent and reliable sequencing outcomes.
用lmaw-dnma方法分析新冠肺炎期间存款银行业的财务绩效
银行作为货币和资本市场中最重要的参与者之一,在各国经济的金融中介过程中发挥着关键作用。存款银行业对银行体系的有效和高效运行至关重要。本研究的目标是建立一个多标准模型,用于衡量和评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间存款银行业的表现。在此背景下,提出了一种由相加权的对数方法(LMAW)和基于双归一化的多重聚合(DNMA)方法组成的集成模型。在本文提出的绩效评价模型的第一阶段,采用LMAW法对基于前人文献确定的绩效指标进行加权。第二阶段,采用DNMA方法对新冠肺炎大流行期间存款银行业的财务绩效进行衡量和评估。在此背景下,提出了一种由相加权的对数方法(LMAW)和基于双归一化的多重聚合(DNMA)方法组成的集成模型。在本文提出的绩效评价模型的第一阶段,采用LMAW法对基于前人文献确定的绩效指标进行加权。第二阶段,采用DNMA方法对新冠肺炎大流行期间存款银行业的财务绩效进行衡量和评估。在对DNMA排名结果进行总体分析时,可以确定存款银行业受到新冠肺炎大流行的严重影响。这表明该部门在管理大流行相关风险方面效率低下。本研究的发现可能有助于银行管理层、投资者和监管机构就银行体系的稳定性做出更准确的决策。还利用各种敏感性分析来验证模型在研究范围内的可靠性和稳健性。敏感性分析的结果表明,建议的方法产生一致和可靠的测序结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信