{"title":"Bird Bonds: Sex, Mate-Choice and Cognition in Australian Native Birds","authors":"P. Hackett","doi":"10.1093/auk/ukaa056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"b a Some parts of this book are novel, interesting, or stimulating; the bibliography is useful. Much, however, has less to do with sex and mate-choice than with cognition and brain chemistry, some already appearing in the author’s Bird Minds (Kaplan 2016). Substantial parts are of value, notably where broad cognitive issues and research are discussed. Kaplan suggests that habitat complexity promotes avian intelligence, that pair-bonding is more than just about reproduction, and that bonding and cooperative group living correlate with longevity. As in Bird Minds, however, this book contains anthropomorphism, speculation (much unfounded), and factual errors so numerous that I cannot note them all. In presenting and interpreting her anecdotal observations of bird behaviour, the author is as much out of her depth as previously (see reviews of her bird books by Jarman & Jones 2005; Brigham 2008; Frith 2018; Ley 2018).","PeriodicalId":382448,"journal":{"name":"The Auk","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Auk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/ukaa056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
b a Some parts of this book are novel, interesting, or stimulating; the bibliography is useful. Much, however, has less to do with sex and mate-choice than with cognition and brain chemistry, some already appearing in the author’s Bird Minds (Kaplan 2016). Substantial parts are of value, notably where broad cognitive issues and research are discussed. Kaplan suggests that habitat complexity promotes avian intelligence, that pair-bonding is more than just about reproduction, and that bonding and cooperative group living correlate with longevity. As in Bird Minds, however, this book contains anthropomorphism, speculation (much unfounded), and factual errors so numerous that I cannot note them all. In presenting and interpreting her anecdotal observations of bird behaviour, the author is as much out of her depth as previously (see reviews of her bird books by Jarman & Jones 2005; Brigham 2008; Frith 2018; Ley 2018).
这本书的某些部分是新颖的、有趣的或刺激的;参考书目很有用。然而,与性和配偶选择的关系更大的是认知和大脑化学,其中一些已经出现在作者的《鸟的思想》(Kaplan 2016)中。实质性的部分是有价值的,特别是在广泛的认知问题和研究的讨论。卡普兰认为,栖息地的复杂性提高了鸟类的智力,配对关系不仅仅是为了繁殖,而且这种关系和合作群体生活与长寿有关。然而,和《鸟的心灵》一样,这本书也包含拟人论、猜测(很多都是毫无根据的)和事实错误,数量之多,我无法一一列举。在介绍和解释她对鸟类行为的轶事观察时,作者和以前一样,超出了她的深度(见Jarman & Jones 2005年对她的鸟类书籍的评论;布里格姆2008;弗里斯2018;雷2018)。