The Islamic State and International Law: An Ideological Rollercoster?

Andrew K Coleman
{"title":"The Islamic State and International Law: An Ideological Rollercoster?","authors":"Andrew K Coleman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2516605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a work-in-progress piece that examines questions raised by the rise of ISIS and the announcement of the formation of a Caliphate. For example, has a State been formed in accordance with the norms of international law - the Montevideo Criteria - and how the answer to this question affects the 'Great Debate' surrounding the theories of recognition. The paper also highlights or raises questions that need to be answered in other areas such as: can an entity be defined as a State in view of potential or alleged breaches of human rights law or international humanitarian law? Can a proto-State or an unrecognised entity be tried for 'war crimes'? The paper argues that if international law is to remain credible in the twenty-first century it must address these questions.","PeriodicalId":181409,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Human Rights (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Human Rights (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2516605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper is a work-in-progress piece that examines questions raised by the rise of ISIS and the announcement of the formation of a Caliphate. For example, has a State been formed in accordance with the norms of international law - the Montevideo Criteria - and how the answer to this question affects the 'Great Debate' surrounding the theories of recognition. The paper also highlights or raises questions that need to be answered in other areas such as: can an entity be defined as a State in view of potential or alleged breaches of human rights law or international humanitarian law? Can a proto-State or an unrecognised entity be tried for 'war crimes'? The paper argues that if international law is to remain credible in the twenty-first century it must address these questions.
伊斯兰国与国际法:意识形态过山车?
这篇文章是一篇正在进行的文章,探讨了ISIS的崛起和哈里发国的宣布形成所带来的问题。例如,一个国家是否按照国际法准则- -《蒙得维的亚标准》- -形成的,以及对这个问题的回答如何影响围绕承认理论的“大辩论”。该文件还强调或提出了在其他领域需要回答的问题,例如:鉴于可能或据称违反人权法或国际人道主义法的行为,是否可以将一个实体定义为国家?原始国或未被承认的实体能否因“战争罪”受到审判?本文认为,如果国际法要在21世纪保持可信,就必须解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信