Reappraising Dodd-Frank's Living Will Regime

David K. Suska
{"title":"Reappraising Dodd-Frank's Living Will Regime","authors":"David K. Suska","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2849810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Congress mandated that certain financial institutions draft “orderly resolution plans” — colloquially termed “living wills” — that detail how each institution could be unwound in case of insolvency. This living will regime is now more than five years old. Yet as consequential as it has been and promises to be, scholars have largely ignored it, except to opine that it does not solve the problem of “too big to fail.” This article fills that gap in the literature. It explains the origins of the regime, defends it as a pragmatic feature of post-crisis financial regulatory reform, and proposes amendments to bolster its legitimacy and legality.","PeriodicalId":137765,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2849810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Congress mandated that certain financial institutions draft “orderly resolution plans” — colloquially termed “living wills” — that detail how each institution could be unwound in case of insolvency. This living will regime is now more than five years old. Yet as consequential as it has been and promises to be, scholars have largely ignored it, except to opine that it does not solve the problem of “too big to fail.” This article fills that gap in the literature. It explains the origins of the regime, defends it as a pragmatic feature of post-crisis financial regulatory reform, and proposes amendments to bolster its legitimacy and legality.
重新评估多德-弗兰克生前遗嘱制度
在2010年的《多德-弗兰克华尔街改革和消费者保护法案》中,国会要求某些金融机构起草“有序的解决方案”——通俗地称为“生前遗嘱”——详细说明每家机构在破产情况下如何分拆。这种生前遗嘱制度至今已有5年多的历史。然而,尽管它已经和有望成为重要的,学者们在很大程度上忽略了它,除了认为它不能解决“太大而不能倒”的问题。这篇文章填补了文献中的空白。它解释了该制度的起源,为其辩护,称其是危机后金融监管改革的一个实用主义特征,并提出了加强其合法性和合法性的修正案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信