Chapter 11: Post-Crisis Regulation and Supervision of Icelandic Banks

Jon Thor Sturluson
{"title":"Chapter 11: Post-Crisis Regulation and Supervision of Icelandic Banks","authors":"Jon Thor Sturluson","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nSince the financial crisis of 2008, legislation and rules affecting the financial market in Iceland have been strengthened considerably. Tougher capital requirements, detailed and frequent reporting, more thorough fit-and-proper tests, barriers to connected lending and strict limits on bonus payments are but a few examples. Similarly, the supervision of banks has been upgraded markedly. It is now much more intrusive and forward-looking than before, that is, it is more focused on governance and the business model. Many of these reforms are based on international initiatives, such as the Basel III standard, while others are particular to Iceland. The main objective of these reforms is to strengthen the resilience of the banking sector and limit the negative effects on consumers of harmful enterprise incentives. Trust in the financial system collapsed as a consequence of the crisis but is recovering only slowly. This apparent lack of confidence is reflected only to a limited extent in firms’ and households’ willingness to seek banking services. This raises the questions of how to appropriately measure trust, and what factors influence it. Iceland may turn out to be an interesting natural experiment in this respect. It has a unique record of prosecuting and sentencing bankers for offences that are hardly worthy of administrative fines in some other countries – but whether strict accountability is the recipe for rebuilding trust remains to be seen.","PeriodicalId":145304,"journal":{"name":"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Since the financial crisis of 2008, legislation and rules affecting the financial market in Iceland have been strengthened considerably. Tougher capital requirements, detailed and frequent reporting, more thorough fit-and-proper tests, barriers to connected lending and strict limits on bonus payments are but a few examples. Similarly, the supervision of banks has been upgraded markedly. It is now much more intrusive and forward-looking than before, that is, it is more focused on governance and the business model. Many of these reforms are based on international initiatives, such as the Basel III standard, while others are particular to Iceland. The main objective of these reforms is to strengthen the resilience of the banking sector and limit the negative effects on consumers of harmful enterprise incentives. Trust in the financial system collapsed as a consequence of the crisis but is recovering only slowly. This apparent lack of confidence is reflected only to a limited extent in firms’ and households’ willingness to seek banking services. This raises the questions of how to appropriately measure trust, and what factors influence it. Iceland may turn out to be an interesting natural experiment in this respect. It has a unique record of prosecuting and sentencing bankers for offences that are hardly worthy of administrative fines in some other countries – but whether strict accountability is the recipe for rebuilding trust remains to be seen.
第11章:危机后冰岛银行的监管
自2008年金融危机以来,影响冰岛金融市场的立法和规则得到了大幅加强。更严格的资本要求、详细而频繁的报告、更彻底的合适性测试、关联贷款的障碍以及对奖金支付的严格限制,这些只是其中的几个例子。同样,对银行的监管也得到了显著提升。它现在比以前更具侵入性和前瞻性,也就是说,它更加关注治理和业务模式。其中许多改革是基于国际倡议,如巴塞尔协议III (Basel III)标准,而其他改革则是冰岛特有的。这些改革的主要目标是加强银行业的弹性,限制有害的企业激励对消费者的负面影响。对金融体系的信任因危机而崩溃,但恢复缓慢。这种明显的缺乏信心只在有限的程度上反映在企业和家庭寻求银行服务的意愿上。这就提出了如何恰当地衡量信任以及影响信任的因素的问题。在这方面,冰岛可能是一个有趣的自然实验。在起诉和判决银行家违法行为方面,英国有着独特的记录——在其他一些国家,这些违法行为几乎不值得处以行政罚款——但严格问责制是否能重建信任,仍有待观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信