External and Internal Imbalances in South Mediterranean Countries

D. Abdou, V. Monastiriotis
{"title":"External and Internal Imbalances in South Mediterranean Countries","authors":"D. Abdou, V. Monastiriotis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3245188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South–MED countries are characterising by non-diversified economic structures. Some are heavily dependent on oil resources to support their economic growth and development; while others are relying disproportionately on real estate, tourism and low-value added export products. This makes them vulnerable to external economic conditions. Together with the wider geo-political situation of the region, which fuels economic uncertainty, this creates significant threats and problems, including with regard to trade deficits and the current account (external imbalances). The domestic political situation is also not conducive to economic stability. Governments in South–MED countries are rather centralised and often lack transparent and good-quality institutions. In the economic sphere, this contributes to exacerbating budget deficits and escalating government debts (internal imbalances). In conjunction, internal and external imbalances both reflect and reinforce the inability of these economies to climb up the value-added ladder, developing more competitive products and specialisations that will help them achieve more sustainable economic growth, balanced fiscal stances and trade account surpluses. Within this context, and largely in response to the new risks that emerged in the financial sphere, with regard to both internal and external imbalances, after the global financial crisis, government policies in the South–MED adopted – sometimes harsh – economic reform programmes as a way to stabilise their economies and manage the associated risks. Adjustment programmes, however, are socially painful and may also have adverse effects on the economy, thus increasing further the fragility of these economies and threatening a further deterioration of their external position. This raises two analytically interesting and, in policy terms, very pressing questions about, on the one hand, the extent and nature of internal and external imbalances in these countries and, on the other hand, the appropriateness of the adjustment policies that were pursued. This study provides an extensive analysis of these issues, focusing on the case of six South–MED countries, namely Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia. It examines in detail the internal and external imbalances of these countries, over the last three decades, both descriptively (through the use of graphs) and econometrically (through time-series econometric techniques). It subsequently reviews the range of adjustment programmes, austerity policies and other macro-economic adjustment mechanisms (e.g., exchange rate policies) that were deployed in these countries to deal with the internal and external threats to stability and, by reflecting on these two lines of research, it provides useful insights about the effectiveness and appropriateness of these policy responses in addressing the problem at hand.","PeriodicalId":378721,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3245188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

South–MED countries are characterising by non-diversified economic structures. Some are heavily dependent on oil resources to support their economic growth and development; while others are relying disproportionately on real estate, tourism and low-value added export products. This makes them vulnerable to external economic conditions. Together with the wider geo-political situation of the region, which fuels economic uncertainty, this creates significant threats and problems, including with regard to trade deficits and the current account (external imbalances). The domestic political situation is also not conducive to economic stability. Governments in South–MED countries are rather centralised and often lack transparent and good-quality institutions. In the economic sphere, this contributes to exacerbating budget deficits and escalating government debts (internal imbalances). In conjunction, internal and external imbalances both reflect and reinforce the inability of these economies to climb up the value-added ladder, developing more competitive products and specialisations that will help them achieve more sustainable economic growth, balanced fiscal stances and trade account surpluses. Within this context, and largely in response to the new risks that emerged in the financial sphere, with regard to both internal and external imbalances, after the global financial crisis, government policies in the South–MED adopted – sometimes harsh – economic reform programmes as a way to stabilise their economies and manage the associated risks. Adjustment programmes, however, are socially painful and may also have adverse effects on the economy, thus increasing further the fragility of these economies and threatening a further deterioration of their external position. This raises two analytically interesting and, in policy terms, very pressing questions about, on the one hand, the extent and nature of internal and external imbalances in these countries and, on the other hand, the appropriateness of the adjustment policies that were pursued. This study provides an extensive analysis of these issues, focusing on the case of six South–MED countries, namely Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia. It examines in detail the internal and external imbalances of these countries, over the last three decades, both descriptively (through the use of graphs) and econometrically (through time-series econometric techniques). It subsequently reviews the range of adjustment programmes, austerity policies and other macro-economic adjustment mechanisms (e.g., exchange rate policies) that were deployed in these countries to deal with the internal and external threats to stability and, by reflecting on these two lines of research, it provides useful insights about the effectiveness and appropriateness of these policy responses in addressing the problem at hand.
南地中海国家的外部和内部失衡
南地中海国家的特点是经济结构不多样化。一些国家严重依赖石油资源来支持其经济增长和发展;而其他国家则过度依赖房地产、旅游业和低附加值出口产品。这使得它们容易受到外部经济条件的影响。加上该地区更广泛的地缘政治局势加剧了经济的不确定性,这造成了重大的威胁和问题,包括贸易逆差和经常账户(外部失衡)。国内政局也不利于经济稳定。南地中海国家的政府相当集权,往往缺乏透明和高质量的机构。在经济领域,这导致预算赤字加剧,政府债务不断升级(内部失衡)。与此同时,内部和外部失衡既反映并强化了这些经济体在攀登增值阶梯、开发更有竞争力的产品和专业化方面的无能,而这些产品和专业化将帮助它们实现更可持续的经济增长、平衡的财政状况和贸易账户盈余。在这种背景下,主要是为了应对全球金融危机后金融领域出现的内部和外部失衡方面的新风险,南-地中海国家的政府政策采取了-有时是严厉的-经济改革方案,作为稳定其经济和管理相关风险的一种方式。然而,调整方案在社会上是痛苦的,也可能对经济产生不利影响,从而进一步增加这些经济的脆弱性,并有可能使其外部状况进一步恶化。这在分析上提出了两个有趣的问题,在政策方面也提出了两个非常紧迫的问题,一方面是这些国家内部和外部不平衡的程度和性质,另一方面是所采取的调整政策是否适当。本研究对这些问题进行了广泛分析,重点是六个南地中海国家,即阿尔及利亚、埃及、约旦、黎巴嫩、摩洛哥和突尼斯。它从描述性(通过使用图表)和计量经济学(通过时间序列计量经济学技术)两方面详细考察了这些国家在过去三十年中的内部和外部失衡。本报告随后审查了这些国家为处理内部和外部对稳定的威胁而采取的调整方案、紧缩政策和其他宏观经济调整机制(例如汇率政策)的范围,并通过对这两条研究路线的反思,对这些政策反应在解决手头问题方面的有效性和适当性提供了有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信