Louise Erdrich’s Place in American Literature: Narrative Innovation in Love Medicine

Richard T. Stock
{"title":"Louise Erdrich’s Place in American Literature: Narrative Innovation in Love Medicine","authors":"Richard T. Stock","doi":"10.1515/pjes-2016-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As a novelist, Louise Erdrich is unique in receiving both popular and critical acclaim. Strangely, her popular appeal has discouraged study of her novels as experimental narrative texts. This is unfortunate, since innovations in Erdrich’s novels rival much “experimental” contemporary American fiction. This study outlines a convention of a three-level hierarchy of characters in novels and compares this convention with two experimental American novels: Infinite Jest (1996) by David Foster Wallace and Gravity’s Rainbow (1973) by Thomas Pynchon. The study then addresses Erdrich’s first novel, Love Medicine (1984), to show that it is unique in not having a main character. Although the other two experimental novels try to do without a main character, neither of them succeed at getting beyond this convention. Love Medicine innovates in at least one major narrative convention in a way that other experimental novels cannot do. This is one way in which Louise Erdrich and Love Medicine compare favorably to some of the most respected experimental contemporary American novels. Erdrich’s novels should take their place alongside other experimental American novels, being studied in similar ways, regardless of whether they are also read by a broad public audience.","PeriodicalId":402791,"journal":{"name":"Prague Journal of English Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prague Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pjes-2016-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract As a novelist, Louise Erdrich is unique in receiving both popular and critical acclaim. Strangely, her popular appeal has discouraged study of her novels as experimental narrative texts. This is unfortunate, since innovations in Erdrich’s novels rival much “experimental” contemporary American fiction. This study outlines a convention of a three-level hierarchy of characters in novels and compares this convention with two experimental American novels: Infinite Jest (1996) by David Foster Wallace and Gravity’s Rainbow (1973) by Thomas Pynchon. The study then addresses Erdrich’s first novel, Love Medicine (1984), to show that it is unique in not having a main character. Although the other two experimental novels try to do without a main character, neither of them succeed at getting beyond this convention. Love Medicine innovates in at least one major narrative convention in a way that other experimental novels cannot do. This is one way in which Louise Erdrich and Love Medicine compare favorably to some of the most respected experimental contemporary American novels. Erdrich’s novels should take their place alongside other experimental American novels, being studied in similar ways, regardless of whether they are also read by a broad public audience.
路易斯·厄德里奇在美国文学中的地位:爱情医学的叙事创新
作为一位小说家,路易丝·厄德里奇在大众和评论界都获得了独特的赞誉。奇怪的是,她的大众吸引力阻碍了她的小说作为实验性叙事文本的研究。这是不幸的,因为厄德里奇小说中的创新与许多“实验性”当代美国小说相媲美。本研究概述了小说中人物三层层次的惯例,并将这种惯例与两部美国实验小说——大卫·福斯特·华莱士的《无尽的玩笑》(1996)和托马斯·品chon的《万有引力之虹》(1973)——进行了比较。该研究接着讨论了厄德里奇的第一部小说《爱情药》(1984),以表明它在没有主角方面是独一无二的。虽然另外两部实验小说试图不设主角,但它们都未能突破这一传统。《爱情医学》至少在一个主要的叙事惯例上有所创新,这是其他实验小说无法做到的。这是路易斯·厄德里奇和《爱情医学》与一些最受尊敬的当代美国实验小说相比更有优势的一点。厄德里奇的小说应该与其他美国实验小说并列,以类似的方式进行研究,而不管它们是否也有广泛的公众读者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信