[Intracranial pressure. Direct measurement in the cisterna magna].

Acta neurologica latinoamericana Pub Date : 1979-01-01
E C Palma, R R Martínez, C Garbino
{"title":"[Intracranial pressure. Direct measurement in the cisterna magna].","authors":"E C Palma,&nbsp;R R Martínez,&nbsp;C Garbino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intracranial cisternal or supraoccipital punction in the sitting position, was undertaken in 523 cases, of which 329 presented increased intracranial pressure. The procedure must be done by experts, and was well tolerated. There were no cases of death, arterial hemorrhages or medullary lesions. In 451 cases CSF pressure was measured and CSF was extracted for laboratory examination. Pneumoencephalograms were undertaken with this method in 335 patients. The intracranial cisternal pressure in the sitting position is greater than the suboccipital or cervical cisternal pressure by 1.5 to 3cm H2O. Its value is practically equal to the pressure in the posterior fossa, and when the medial ventricular system is patent, is similar to the pressure in the supratentorial fossas. The intracranial cisternal punction has less risks than the suboccipital punction and can be undertaken in patients with rised intracranial pressure In 62 cases the tap was negative; this led to the diagnosis of amygdaline herniation and the procedure was interrupted without mishap. The authors consider that, in the future, the connection of the cisternal catheter with a transducer, will permit the continuous monitoring of the intracranial cisternal pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":75394,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica latinoamericana","volume":"25 3-4","pages":"225-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica latinoamericana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intracranial cisternal or supraoccipital punction in the sitting position, was undertaken in 523 cases, of which 329 presented increased intracranial pressure. The procedure must be done by experts, and was well tolerated. There were no cases of death, arterial hemorrhages or medullary lesions. In 451 cases CSF pressure was measured and CSF was extracted for laboratory examination. Pneumoencephalograms were undertaken with this method in 335 patients. The intracranial cisternal pressure in the sitting position is greater than the suboccipital or cervical cisternal pressure by 1.5 to 3cm H2O. Its value is practically equal to the pressure in the posterior fossa, and when the medial ventricular system is patent, is similar to the pressure in the supratentorial fossas. The intracranial cisternal punction has less risks than the suboccipital punction and can be undertaken in patients with rised intracranial pressure In 62 cases the tap was negative; this led to the diagnosis of amygdaline herniation and the procedure was interrupted without mishap. The authors consider that, in the future, the connection of the cisternal catheter with a transducer, will permit the continuous monitoring of the intracranial cisternal pressure.

[颅内压。直接测量[大池]。
523例患者在坐位时行脑池或枕上穿刺,其中329例出现颅内压增高。这个过程必须由专家来完成,而且是可以接受的。无死亡、动脉出血或髓质病变病例。测定451例脑脊液压力,抽取脑脊液进行实验室检查。用这种方法对335例患者进行了气脑造影。坐位时颅内池压比枕下或颈池压大1.5 ~ 3cm H2O。它的值实际上等于后窝的压力,当内侧脑室系统未闭时,它与幕上窝的压力相似。颅内池穿刺比枕下穿刺风险小,可用于颅内压升高的患者,62例穿刺阴性;这导致了杏仁碱疝的诊断,手术被中断,没有发生意外。作者认为,在未来,池导管与传感器的连接,将允许连续监测颅内池压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信