Collaborative learning, role play and case study: Pedagogical pathways to professionalism and ethics in school placement

Manuela Heinz, Mary Fleming, P. Logue, Josephine McNamara
{"title":"Collaborative learning, role play and case study: Pedagogical pathways to professionalism and ethics in school placement","authors":"Manuela Heinz, Mary Fleming, P. Logue, Josephine McNamara","doi":"10.33178/lc2019.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers are moral agents. Acting professionally in loco parentis teachers have a legal and moral duty of care to students (DES, 2017). Moreover, they can be regarded as moral ‘role models’ (Bergen, 2006; Lumpkin, 2013). Professional codes of practice assist teachers in their moral agency (Alberta Teachers’ Association, 2004; CDET, 2017; DfE, 2011; Education Council, 2017; Teaching Council, 2012; 2016; World Class Teachers, 2017). In conjunction with official codes of conduct, TE ethics programmes contribute to the development of “a moral language” and raise awareness of moral agency in teaching (Shapira-Lishchinsky, 2010). In 2014 the National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG) and the Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology (GMIT) jointly developed a cross-institutional training programme entitled ‘The Ethical Teacher Programme’, designed to facilitate student teachers to reflect upon professionalism and ethics during School Placement. The programme incorporated both a study of the Teaching Council Code of Professional Conduct for Teachers (Code) (2012) and explorations of selected ethical ‘case studies’ in teaching, using collaborative learning (CL) and role play strategies. The ‘ethical dilemma’ approach employed mirrored literature studies (Colenerud, 1997; Husu & Tiri, 2003; Klassen, 2002). Unique to the approach, however, was the method of application of selected classical and contemporary ethical philosophies to moral dilemmas in teaching. The programme was designed to include a one-hour introductory lecture on professionalism and ethics (from the perspectives of moral literacy and ethical theory) followed by a two-hour applied workshop. The workshop employed student-centred, active teaching and learning methods, specifically, collaborative learning, role play and case study analysis. Six ethical philosophical principles (or ‘lenses’) were integrated into programme delivery - teleology, deontology, virtue ethics, justice ethics, care ethics and relationality ethics. These lenses were applied to real-world teaching case studies. One cohort to which this training programme is offered annually is the student teachers on the Professional Master of Education (PME) programme in NUIG. The PME cohort (2015-2016) is the focus of the present study. The study sought a critical reflection on, and evaluation of, this training programme, from a student perspective. This study is phase one of a larger on-going study.","PeriodicalId":278383,"journal":{"name":"Learning Connections 2019: Spaces, People, Practice","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Connections 2019: Spaces, People, Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33178/lc2019.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers are moral agents. Acting professionally in loco parentis teachers have a legal and moral duty of care to students (DES, 2017). Moreover, they can be regarded as moral ‘role models’ (Bergen, 2006; Lumpkin, 2013). Professional codes of practice assist teachers in their moral agency (Alberta Teachers’ Association, 2004; CDET, 2017; DfE, 2011; Education Council, 2017; Teaching Council, 2012; 2016; World Class Teachers, 2017). In conjunction with official codes of conduct, TE ethics programmes contribute to the development of “a moral language” and raise awareness of moral agency in teaching (Shapira-Lishchinsky, 2010). In 2014 the National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG) and the Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology (GMIT) jointly developed a cross-institutional training programme entitled ‘The Ethical Teacher Programme’, designed to facilitate student teachers to reflect upon professionalism and ethics during School Placement. The programme incorporated both a study of the Teaching Council Code of Professional Conduct for Teachers (Code) (2012) and explorations of selected ethical ‘case studies’ in teaching, using collaborative learning (CL) and role play strategies. The ‘ethical dilemma’ approach employed mirrored literature studies (Colenerud, 1997; Husu & Tiri, 2003; Klassen, 2002). Unique to the approach, however, was the method of application of selected classical and contemporary ethical philosophies to moral dilemmas in teaching. The programme was designed to include a one-hour introductory lecture on professionalism and ethics (from the perspectives of moral literacy and ethical theory) followed by a two-hour applied workshop. The workshop employed student-centred, active teaching and learning methods, specifically, collaborative learning, role play and case study analysis. Six ethical philosophical principles (or ‘lenses’) were integrated into programme delivery - teleology, deontology, virtue ethics, justice ethics, care ethics and relationality ethics. These lenses were applied to real-world teaching case studies. One cohort to which this training programme is offered annually is the student teachers on the Professional Master of Education (PME) programme in NUIG. The PME cohort (2015-2016) is the focus of the present study. The study sought a critical reflection on, and evaluation of, this training programme, from a student perspective. This study is phase one of a larger on-going study.
合作学习,角色扮演和案例研究:学校安置专业和道德的教学途径
教师是道德的代理人。作为专业的家长,教师对学生有法律和道德上的责任(DES, 2017)。此外,他们可以被视为道德“榜样”(Bergen, 2006;”,2013)。专业行为准则帮助教师发挥道德能动性(艾伯塔省教师协会,2004年;CDET, 2017;教育部,2011;教育理事会,2017;教学委员会,2012;2016;世界一流教师,2017)。与官方行为准则相结合,教育伦理课程有助于“道德语言”的发展,并提高教学中道德主体的意识(Shapira-Lishchinsky, 2010)。2014年,爱尔兰国立高威大学(NUIG)和高威-梅奥理工学院(GMIT)联合开发了一项名为“道德教师计划”的跨机构培训计划,旨在促进学生教师在学校安置期间反思专业精神和道德。该计划结合了对教学委员会教师职业行为准则(准则)(2012)的研究和对教学中选定的道德“案例研究”的探索,使用协作学习(CL)和角色扮演策略。“伦理困境”方法采用镜像文献研究(Colenerud, 1997;Husu & Tiri, 2003;克,2002)。然而,这种方法的独特之处在于,它将精选的古典和当代伦理哲学应用于教学中的道德困境。该方案的设计包括一个小时的专业精神和道德(从道德素养和伦理理论的角度)介绍性讲座,然后是一个两小时的应用讲习班。工作坊采用以学生为中心、积极主动的教学方法,特别是合作学习、角色扮演和案例研究分析。六项伦理哲学原则(或“镜头”)被纳入方案实施——目的论、义务论、美德伦理、正义伦理、关怀伦理和关系伦理。这些镜头被应用到现实世界的教学案例研究中。每年向参加这一培训方案的一群人是NUIG教育专业硕士方案的实习教师。PME队列(2015-2016)是本研究的重点。这项研究试图从学生的角度对这一培训方案进行批判性的反思和评价。这项研究是一项正在进行的大型研究的第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信