Analysis of Flow Characteristics in Porous Media with Heterogeneity at Microscale and Macroscale

K. Gerke, A. Isaeva, M. Karsanina, E. Shaporenko, D. Korost
{"title":"Analysis of Flow Characteristics in Porous Media with Heterogeneity at Microscale and Macroscale","authors":"K. Gerke, A. Isaeva, M. Karsanina, E. Shaporenko, D. Korost","doi":"10.2118/196882-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hydrodynamic or oilfield scale models are needed to predict long-term the production process, to design and optimise well placement and evaluate the outcomes of different enhanced recovery practises. These models operate using continuum medium approximations and upscaled effective porous media properties such as permeability, relative permeability and capillary curves and are conventionally based on (multiphase generalization of) Darcy and continuity equations. In this work we explored the difference between flow patterns on the Darcy scale depending on how we parameterized the model – using scalar permeability values, or based on pore-scale simulations on 3D pore geometries of real rock samples. In the latter case two permeabilities were utilized – conventional directional permeability (in three directions) and full permeability tensor. Our results strongly support the idea that full tensors are needed to accurately represent fluxes at Darcy scale then upscaling from core-scale measurements or simulations, or even if using geologic/geostatistical model (with spatial heterogeneous distribution of flow properties). More specifically, our upscaled Darcy scale model parameterized using hypothetical scalar or pore-scale simulated permeabilities revealed: even a simple scalar permeability field, if heterogeneous, produces significant off-diagonal terms in tensorial permeability results; using tensoral permeabilities when upscaling from the core-scale results in significant difference in upscaled (tensorial) permeabilities compared to conventional directional simulation framework.","PeriodicalId":220399,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 24, 2019","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 24, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196882-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrodynamic or oilfield scale models are needed to predict long-term the production process, to design and optimise well placement and evaluate the outcomes of different enhanced recovery practises. These models operate using continuum medium approximations and upscaled effective porous media properties such as permeability, relative permeability and capillary curves and are conventionally based on (multiphase generalization of) Darcy and continuity equations. In this work we explored the difference between flow patterns on the Darcy scale depending on how we parameterized the model – using scalar permeability values, or based on pore-scale simulations on 3D pore geometries of real rock samples. In the latter case two permeabilities were utilized – conventional directional permeability (in three directions) and full permeability tensor. Our results strongly support the idea that full tensors are needed to accurately represent fluxes at Darcy scale then upscaling from core-scale measurements or simulations, or even if using geologic/geostatistical model (with spatial heterogeneous distribution of flow properties). More specifically, our upscaled Darcy scale model parameterized using hypothetical scalar or pore-scale simulated permeabilities revealed: even a simple scalar permeability field, if heterogeneous, produces significant off-diagonal terms in tensorial permeability results; using tensoral permeabilities when upscaling from the core-scale results in significant difference in upscaled (tensorial) permeabilities compared to conventional directional simulation framework.
微观和宏观非均质多孔介质流动特性分析
需要流体动力学或油田规模模型来预测长期生产过程,设计和优化井位,并评估不同提高采收率措施的效果。这些模型使用连续介质近似和放大的有效多孔介质特性(如渗透率、相对渗透率和毛管曲线),通常基于达西方程和连续性方程(多相概化)。在这项工作中,我们探索了达西尺度上流动模式的差异,这取决于我们如何参数化模型——使用标量渗透率值,或基于真实岩石样品的三维孔隙几何形状的孔隙尺度模拟。在后一种情况下,使用了两种渗透率-常规定向渗透率(三个方向)和全渗透率张量。我们的研究结果强烈支持这样的观点,即需要全张量来准确地表示达西尺度的通量,然后从核心尺度的测量或模拟中升级,甚至使用地质/地质统计模型(具有流动特性的空间非均匀分布)。更具体地说,我们使用假设的标量或孔隙尺度模拟渗透率参数化的升级达西尺度模型表明:即使是一个简单的标量渗透率场,如果是非均质的,也会在张量渗透率结果中产生显著的非对角线项;与传统的定向模拟框架相比,当从核心尺度升级时使用张量渗透率会导致升级(张量)渗透率的显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信