Blind G. Al-Talabani, Twana Kareem, Seerwan O. Hasan, Jwan Rasheed
{"title":"Limb amputation of an infant with transposition of great arteries using spinal anesthesia","authors":"Blind G. Al-Talabani, Twana Kareem, Seerwan O. Hasan, Jwan Rasheed","doi":"10.5348/100016a05ba2018cr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Spinal and caudal anesthesia are useful anesthetic techniques for infants compared to general anesthesia. In case of infants lumbar puncture can be safely performed at or just below the intercristal line. Due to the presence of loose fatty tissues in the caudal extradural space, it becomes safe and easy to insert a cannula enabling easy cranial spread of local anesthetic drugs. Increased production and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid in infants lead to administration of higher doses of local anesthetics. However, this spinal and caudal anesthesia has lesser risk of post-operative apnea in infants compared to general anesthesia.\n\n Case Report: A three-month-old male infant, whose body weight was seven and half kilograms, was afflicted with ischemia which extended to half of his right leg. There was gangrene on his right big toe as well. These developments occurred after cardiac catheterization was implemented through right femoral vein cannulation. Due to high-risk of transposition of great arteries in general anesthesia, the surgeons finalized under spinal anesthesia in order to bypass the infected respiratory system, prevent aspiration because of full stomach, and to get better postoperative analgesia.\n\n Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is an alternative option to general anesthesia in high risk patients owing to its safety. However, in case of spinal complications or failure of spinal anesthesia, the anesthetist should always get ready with the high risk general anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":193456,"journal":{"name":"Edorium Journal of Anesthesia","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edorium Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/100016a05ba2018cr","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal and caudal anesthesia are useful anesthetic techniques for infants compared to general anesthesia. In case of infants lumbar puncture can be safely performed at or just below the intercristal line. Due to the presence of loose fatty tissues in the caudal extradural space, it becomes safe and easy to insert a cannula enabling easy cranial spread of local anesthetic drugs. Increased production and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid in infants lead to administration of higher doses of local anesthetics. However, this spinal and caudal anesthesia has lesser risk of post-operative apnea in infants compared to general anesthesia.
Case Report: A three-month-old male infant, whose body weight was seven and half kilograms, was afflicted with ischemia which extended to half of his right leg. There was gangrene on his right big toe as well. These developments occurred after cardiac catheterization was implemented through right femoral vein cannulation. Due to high-risk of transposition of great arteries in general anesthesia, the surgeons finalized under spinal anesthesia in order to bypass the infected respiratory system, prevent aspiration because of full stomach, and to get better postoperative analgesia.
Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is an alternative option to general anesthesia in high risk patients owing to its safety. However, in case of spinal complications or failure of spinal anesthesia, the anesthetist should always get ready with the high risk general anesthesia.