Limb amputation of an infant with transposition of great arteries using spinal anesthesia

Blind G. Al-Talabani, Twana Kareem, Seerwan O. Hasan, Jwan Rasheed
{"title":"Limb amputation of an infant with transposition of great arteries using spinal anesthesia","authors":"Blind G. Al-Talabani, Twana Kareem, Seerwan O. Hasan, Jwan Rasheed","doi":"10.5348/100016a05ba2018cr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Spinal and caudal anesthesia are useful anesthetic techniques for infants compared to general anesthesia. In case of infants lumbar puncture can be safely performed at or just below the intercristal line. Due to the presence of loose fatty tissues in the caudal extradural space, it becomes safe and easy to insert a cannula enabling easy cranial spread of local anesthetic drugs. Increased production and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid in infants lead to administration of higher doses of local anesthetics. However, this spinal and caudal anesthesia has lesser risk of post-operative apnea in infants compared to general anesthesia.\n\n Case Report: A three-month-old male infant, whose body weight was seven and half kilograms, was afflicted with ischemia which extended to half of his right leg. There was gangrene on his right big toe as well. These developments occurred after cardiac catheterization was implemented through right femoral vein cannulation. Due to high-risk of transposition of great arteries in general anesthesia, the surgeons finalized under spinal anesthesia in order to bypass the infected respiratory system, prevent aspiration because of full stomach, and to get better postoperative analgesia.\n\n Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is an alternative option to general anesthesia in high risk patients owing to its safety. However, in case of spinal complications or failure of spinal anesthesia, the anesthetist should always get ready with the high risk general anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":193456,"journal":{"name":"Edorium Journal of Anesthesia","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edorium Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/100016a05ba2018cr","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal and caudal anesthesia are useful anesthetic techniques for infants compared to general anesthesia. In case of infants lumbar puncture can be safely performed at or just below the intercristal line. Due to the presence of loose fatty tissues in the caudal extradural space, it becomes safe and easy to insert a cannula enabling easy cranial spread of local anesthetic drugs. Increased production and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid in infants lead to administration of higher doses of local anesthetics. However, this spinal and caudal anesthesia has lesser risk of post-operative apnea in infants compared to general anesthesia. Case Report: A three-month-old male infant, whose body weight was seven and half kilograms, was afflicted with ischemia which extended to half of his right leg. There was gangrene on his right big toe as well. These developments occurred after cardiac catheterization was implemented through right femoral vein cannulation. Due to high-risk of transposition of great arteries in general anesthesia, the surgeons finalized under spinal anesthesia in order to bypass the infected respiratory system, prevent aspiration because of full stomach, and to get better postoperative analgesia. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is an alternative option to general anesthesia in high risk patients owing to its safety. However, in case of spinal complications or failure of spinal anesthesia, the anesthetist should always get ready with the high risk general anesthesia.
脊髓麻醉下大动脉转位婴儿截肢一例
与全身麻醉相比,脊髓和尾侧麻醉对婴儿是有用的麻醉技术。在婴儿的情况下,腰椎穿刺可以安全地在椎间线或刚好低于椎间线处进行。由于尾侧硬膜外间隙存在疏松的脂肪组织,因此插管变得安全且容易,从而使局麻药物易于在颅骨扩散。婴儿脑脊液的产生和吸收增加,导致局部麻醉剂的剂量增加。然而,与全身麻醉相比,脊髓和尾侧麻醉对婴儿术后呼吸暂停的风险较低。病例报告:1例3个月大男婴,体重7.5公斤,右腿半段缺血。他的右大脚趾也有坏疽。这些进展发生在通过右股静脉插管实施心导管置入术后。由于全麻下存在大动脉转位的高危,为了绕过感染的呼吸系统,防止胃饱导致误吸,以及术后更好的镇痛,手术在脊髓麻醉下完成。结论:脊髓麻醉具有较好的安全性,可作为高危患者全身麻醉的替代方案。然而,如果出现脊髓并发症或脊髓麻醉失败,麻醉师应随时做好高危全身麻醉的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信