Could Market Making Be Profitable in the European Carbon Market?

E. Galariotis, I. Kalaitzoglou, K. Kosmidou, S. Papaefthimiou, S. Spyrou
{"title":"Could Market Making Be Profitable in the European Carbon Market?","authors":"E. Galariotis, I. Kalaitzoglou, K. Kosmidou, S. Papaefthimiou, S. Spyrou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3198422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate when market making can be profitable in the European Carbon Futures market, by developing an order type selection rule, based solely on transaction level data. We employ a granular approach that uses an observable variable, i.e. trading intensity, to extract the liquidity and information price components and we investigate their impact on spreads, volatility and ultimately on the profitability of different order types. We find that market orders are always less profitable than limit orders. In addition, market makers are expected to derive most of their profits in a low trading intensity environment, mainly due to higher liquidity commissions and a lower probability of dealing with better informed agents. In contrast, an unconditional limit order submission strategy from an off-floor trader should not be preferred, apart from a medium trading intensity environment, where information and liquidity premia adequately compensate them for execution and information risk.","PeriodicalId":292025,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Commodity Markets eJournal","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Commodity Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3198422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We investigate when market making can be profitable in the European Carbon Futures market, by developing an order type selection rule, based solely on transaction level data. We employ a granular approach that uses an observable variable, i.e. trading intensity, to extract the liquidity and information price components and we investigate their impact on spreads, volatility and ultimately on the profitability of different order types. We find that market orders are always less profitable than limit orders. In addition, market makers are expected to derive most of their profits in a low trading intensity environment, mainly due to higher liquidity commissions and a lower probability of dealing with better informed agents. In contrast, an unconditional limit order submission strategy from an off-floor trader should not be preferred, apart from a medium trading intensity environment, where information and liquidity premia adequately compensate them for execution and information risk.
在欧洲碳市场做市是否有利可图?
我们研究做市商何时可以在欧洲碳期货市场上盈利,通过开发一个订单类型选择规则,仅基于交易水平数据。我们采用颗粒方法,使用可观察变量,即交易强度,提取流动性和信息价格组成部分,并研究它们对点差,波动性和最终对不同订单类型的盈利能力的影响。我们发现市价订单的利润总是低于限价订单。此外,做市商预计将在低交易强度的环境中获得大部分利润,这主要是由于较高的流动性佣金和与消息更灵通的代理人交易的可能性较低。相比之下,场外交易者的无条件限价单提交策略不应该是首选,除了中等交易强度的环境,其中信息和流动性溢价足以补偿他们的执行和信息风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信