Action Research conceptualised in seven cornerstones as conditions for transforming education

Christine Edwards-Groves, Karin Rönnerman
{"title":"Action Research conceptualised in seven cornerstones as conditions for transforming education","authors":"Christine Edwards-Groves, Karin Rönnerman","doi":"10.3224/ijar.v18i2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article traces the philosophical and theoretical roots of Action Research to rescript its promise for site-based educational formation, reformation and transformation. The process of historicising Action Research through an extensive review of the extant literature, enabled us to establish seven cornerstones that captured the essence of the critical conditions: the practices and practice architectures, that give coherence and comprehensibility to Action Research as necessary for sustained and sustainable change in education. Framing these practices and practice architectures as cornerstones sets down important benefits for contemporary education requiring critical inquiry, rethought purposeful action and systematic responsive development. The cornerstones: contextuality, commitment, communication, collaboration, criticality, collegiality and community, were derived from viewing Action Research from its historical principle committed to democratic way of working. It is our position that the cornerstones account for, acknowledge and extend traditional perspectives and descriptions; and assist practitioners deepen understandings about the conditions necessary for opening up generative possibilities of Action Research in ways that do not neglect or lose sight of its core historical connections and democratic virtues.","PeriodicalId":416587,"journal":{"name":"IJAR – International Journal of Action Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJAR – International Journal of Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v18i2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article traces the philosophical and theoretical roots of Action Research to rescript its promise for site-based educational formation, reformation and transformation. The process of historicising Action Research through an extensive review of the extant literature, enabled us to establish seven cornerstones that captured the essence of the critical conditions: the practices and practice architectures, that give coherence and comprehensibility to Action Research as necessary for sustained and sustainable change in education. Framing these practices and practice architectures as cornerstones sets down important benefits for contemporary education requiring critical inquiry, rethought purposeful action and systematic responsive development. The cornerstones: contextuality, commitment, communication, collaboration, criticality, collegiality and community, were derived from viewing Action Research from its historical principle committed to democratic way of working. It is our position that the cornerstones account for, acknowledge and extend traditional perspectives and descriptions; and assist practitioners deepen understandings about the conditions necessary for opening up generative possibilities of Action Research in ways that do not neglect or lose sight of its core historical connections and democratic virtues.
行动研究将七个基石概念化为教育转型的条件
本文追溯了行动研究的哲学和理论根源,为现场教育的形成、改革和转型指明了方向。通过对现有文献的广泛回顾,将行动研究历史化的过程使我们能够建立七个基石,这些基石抓住了关键条件的本质:实践和实践架构,它们为行动研究提供了连贯性和可理解性,这是教育持续和可持续变革所必需的。将这些实践和实践架构作为基石,为需要批判性探究、反思、有目的的行动和系统响应性发展的当代教育奠定了重要的好处。基石:情境性、承诺、沟通、协作、关键性、同僚性和社区,这些都是从行动研究致力于民主工作方式的历史原则出发的。这是我们的立场,基石解释,承认和扩展传统的观点和描述;并帮助实践者加深对开放行动研究生成可能性的必要条件的理解,同时不忽视或忽视其核心历史联系和民主美德。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信