Evaluation and Recommendations for edX MOOC Platform based on Instructional Design and Interaction Design Principles

Citra Glory, Kasiyah, H. Santoso
{"title":"Evaluation and Recommendations for edX MOOC Platform based on Instructional Design and Interaction Design Principles","authors":"Citra Glory, Kasiyah, H. Santoso","doi":"10.1109/ICACSIS47736.2019.8979779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MOOCs are quite well-known internationally. The development of the MOOC has even taken place rapidly in various countries. However, MOOCs in Indonesia do not seem to be popular or growing. This study aims to evaluate one of MOOC platforms, edX, in the Indonesian context involving 279 participants mostly from Jabodetabek (Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi). The evaluation is only done on free courses, and is based on instructional design and interaction design principles: Gagne’s Nine Levels of Learning and Chickering, Gamson's Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, and Shneiderman's Eight Golden Rules of the Interface Design. The results of this study indicate that assessing performance (Gagne’s Nine Levels of Learning) and emphasizing time on task (Chickering and Gamson’s Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education) have not been fully implemented by edX. Alternative design recommendations are proposed to improve the edX website based on the principles that have not been met.","PeriodicalId":165090,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and information Systems (ICACSIS)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and information Systems (ICACSIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS47736.2019.8979779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

MOOCs are quite well-known internationally. The development of the MOOC has even taken place rapidly in various countries. However, MOOCs in Indonesia do not seem to be popular or growing. This study aims to evaluate one of MOOC platforms, edX, in the Indonesian context involving 279 participants mostly from Jabodetabek (Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi). The evaluation is only done on free courses, and is based on instructional design and interaction design principles: Gagne’s Nine Levels of Learning and Chickering, Gamson's Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, and Shneiderman's Eight Golden Rules of the Interface Design. The results of this study indicate that assessing performance (Gagne’s Nine Levels of Learning) and emphasizing time on task (Chickering and Gamson’s Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education) have not been fully implemented by edX. Alternative design recommendations are proposed to improve the edX website based on the principles that have not been met.
基于教学设计与交互设计原则的edX MOOC平台评价与建议
mooc在国际上相当有名。MOOC的发展甚至在各国都得到了迅速的发展。然而,mooc在印尼似乎并不受欢迎,也没有增长。本研究旨在评估印尼背景下的MOOC平台之一edX,涉及279名参与者,主要来自Jabodetabek(雅加达、茂物、德波、丹格朗和别加西)。评估只在免费课程上进行,并基于教学设计和交互设计原则:Gagne的九级学习和Chickering, Gamson的本科教育良好实践的七项原则,以及Shneiderman的界面设计的八条黄金法则。本研究的结果表明,评估绩效(Gagne的九个学习层次)和强调任务时间(Chickering和Gamson的本科教育良好实践的七个原则)并没有被edX充分实施。根据尚未满足的原则,提出了改进edX网站的替代设计建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信