Teaching handball to U-16 and U-18 women’s teams: coaches’ perspective on the long-term

R. Menezes, N. Ramos, R. Marques, M. Nunomura
{"title":"Teaching handball to U-16 and U-18 women’s teams: coaches’ perspective on the long-term","authors":"R. Menezes, N. Ramos, R. Marques, M. Nunomura","doi":"10.1590/S1980-6574201800040001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– Aims: To identify the teaching approaches preferred by Brazilian coaches in the U-16 and U-18 women’s teams and whether it is possible to apply long-term goals for handball training. Methods: Six experienced coaches were interviewed individually in a semi-structured format. Data were transcribed and analyzed according to the Collective Subject Discourse (CSD) method. Results: Coaches revealed a choice for the situational approach and global-functional approach in U-16 teams. In U-18 teams, coaches’ choices were for the technique and situational approaches. The change of coaches’ choice might be based on players’ specialization, suggested to U-18 teams when coaches highlighted the increased demand for performance. On players’ transition from U-16 to U-18 teams, the coaches showed less preference for the global-functional approach and increasing evidence of the technique approach. Conclusion: Global-functional and situational approaches should be given a prominent position in these teams, especially due to the development of technical-tactical aspects. However, the technical approach was recognized as a central position in U-18 teams, probably related to players’ specialization and technical improvement, although it does not offer a rich environment for the development of players’ decision making.","PeriodicalId":153884,"journal":{"name":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201800040001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

– Aims: To identify the teaching approaches preferred by Brazilian coaches in the U-16 and U-18 women’s teams and whether it is possible to apply long-term goals for handball training. Methods: Six experienced coaches were interviewed individually in a semi-structured format. Data were transcribed and analyzed according to the Collective Subject Discourse (CSD) method. Results: Coaches revealed a choice for the situational approach and global-functional approach in U-16 teams. In U-18 teams, coaches’ choices were for the technique and situational approaches. The change of coaches’ choice might be based on players’ specialization, suggested to U-18 teams when coaches highlighted the increased demand for performance. On players’ transition from U-16 to U-18 teams, the coaches showed less preference for the global-functional approach and increasing evidence of the technique approach. Conclusion: Global-functional and situational approaches should be given a prominent position in these teams, especially due to the development of technical-tactical aspects. However, the technical approach was recognized as a central position in U-18 teams, probably related to players’ specialization and technical improvement, although it does not offer a rich environment for the development of players’ decision making.
U-16和U-18女队手球教学:教练的长远观点
-目的:确定巴西U-16和U-18女队教练偏爱的教学方法,以及是否有可能将长期目标应用于手球训练。方法:以半结构化方式对6名经验丰富的教练员进行单独访谈。采用集体主体话语(CSD)方法对数据进行转录和分析。结果:U-16球队教练员对情境法和整体功能法有不同的选择。在U-18球队中,教练员的选择主要是技战术和情境战术。教练的选择可能是基于球员的专业化,这是教练在强调对成绩的需求增加时向U-18球队提出的建议。在U-16向U-18的过渡中,教练员对整体功能方法的偏好减少,对技术方法的偏好增加。结论:全局功能和情境方法应该在这些团队中占据突出地位,特别是由于技术战术方面的发展。然而,技术方法在U-18球队中被认为是中心位置,这可能与球员的专业化和技术进步有关,尽管它没有为球员的决策发展提供丰富的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信