Gender differences in the use of SCREAM Rhetorical devices displayed on video presentations: (An analysis of undergraduate students' persuasive presentations)

J. Luke, Kiky Soraya
{"title":"Gender differences in the use of SCREAM Rhetorical devices displayed on video presentations: (An analysis of undergraduate students' persuasive presentations)","authors":"J. Luke, Kiky Soraya","doi":"10.1109/HSI.2017.8005009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delivering persuasive presentation is a challenging task for the university students. One of the difficult parts is grasping the attention of audiences during the critical situations, such as in the early morning or after the lunch break. At the situations, students are not paying more attention to any speeches or presentations occurred in the classroom because of some lapses of attention span such as poor listening, yawns, blurred visual images, and noisy situations. For that reasons, the study seeks to investigate the most preferred SCREAM Rhetorical devices used by male and female students when doing persuasive presentation and verify whether gender differences play a role in the way the male and female students exploited SCREAM Rhetorical devices to persuade the audiences. To explore the application of SCREAM Rhetorical devices, this study involved sixteen English Business Presentation students; eight males and eight females who were randomly selected to record the business presentation in video as multimedia learning device. Then, the presentations through the videos were analyzed using Windingland (2012) SCREAM taxonomy that comprises Rhetorical devices into six types: Simile, Contrast, Rhyme, Echo, Alliteration, and Metaphor. The significant findings proved that the presentations displayed on the videos showed that all respondents executed SCREAM Rhetorical devices. The gender differences influenced the SCREAM rhetorical devices used. Interestingly, of six devices, Echo is the most preferred device exploited in the students' persuasive presentation.","PeriodicalId":355011,"journal":{"name":"2017 10th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 10th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2017.8005009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Delivering persuasive presentation is a challenging task for the university students. One of the difficult parts is grasping the attention of audiences during the critical situations, such as in the early morning or after the lunch break. At the situations, students are not paying more attention to any speeches or presentations occurred in the classroom because of some lapses of attention span such as poor listening, yawns, blurred visual images, and noisy situations. For that reasons, the study seeks to investigate the most preferred SCREAM Rhetorical devices used by male and female students when doing persuasive presentation and verify whether gender differences play a role in the way the male and female students exploited SCREAM Rhetorical devices to persuade the audiences. To explore the application of SCREAM Rhetorical devices, this study involved sixteen English Business Presentation students; eight males and eight females who were randomly selected to record the business presentation in video as multimedia learning device. Then, the presentations through the videos were analyzed using Windingland (2012) SCREAM taxonomy that comprises Rhetorical devices into six types: Simile, Contrast, Rhyme, Echo, Alliteration, and Metaphor. The significant findings proved that the presentations displayed on the videos showed that all respondents executed SCREAM Rhetorical devices. The gender differences influenced the SCREAM rhetorical devices used. Interestingly, of six devices, Echo is the most preferred device exploited in the students' persuasive presentation.
视频演讲中尖叫修辞手法使用的性别差异:(对大学生说服力演讲的分析)
对大学生来说,做有说服力的演讲是一项具有挑战性的任务。其中一个难点是在关键时刻,如清晨或午休后,如何抓住观众的注意力。在这种情况下,学生们不会更多地关注课堂上发生的任何演讲或报告,因为一些注意力持续时间的失误,如听力差、打哈欠、视觉图像模糊、嘈杂的情况。因此,本研究试图调查男女学生在进行说服性演讲时最喜欢使用的尖叫修辞手段,并验证性别差异是否在男女学生利用尖叫修辞手段说服观众的方式中起作用。为了探讨尖叫修辞手法的运用,本研究以16名商务英语Presentation学生为研究对象;随机选择8名男性和8名女性,将商业演示录成视频作为多媒体学习设备。然后,使用Windingland(2012)的SCREAM分类法对视频中的演讲进行分析,该分类法将修辞手段分为六种类型:明喻、对比、押韵、呼应、头韵和隐喻。重要的发现证明,在视频显示的演示文稿显示,所有受访者执行尖叫修辞手段。性别差异影响了尖叫修辞手段的使用。有趣的是,在六种设备中,Echo是学生在说服力演讲中最喜欢使用的设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信