Universal White: Discrimination and Selection in James’s American Scene

E. Coit
{"title":"Universal White: Discrimination and Selection in James’s American Scene","authors":"E. Coit","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474475402.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 4 reads James’s 1898 essays on American Letters, The American Scene, ‘The Question of Our Speech’, and ‘Charles Eliot Norton’, alongside writing by Charles Eliot Norton and Charles William Eliot, among others. During the early years of the twentieth century, Harvard thinkers address questions about the political responsibilities and powers of the 'college-bred'; this chapter argues that James responds to this discussion about the cultivated elite (or what Matthew Arnold calls 'the remnant') by directing attention to that elite's private pleasures rather than its public responsibilities. Tracing across multiple texts James's articulation of an aesthetic that prizes difference, discrimination, delimitation, and exclusion, the chapter shows that he, like Edith Wharton, associates these desirable qualities with the social hierarchies of the Old World. Although his celebration of intricately shaded heterogeneity has been hailed as anti-nativist or progressive, his critical portrayal of white homogeneity can function to criticise not racism or nativism but rather the egalitarian democracy with which such whiteness was closely associated. In contrasting his own practice of culture against that of Norton's 'Puritan' type, James distances himself from that type's commitments to asceticism and moralizing, and also its lingering associations with radicalism, antislavery sentiment, and democracy.","PeriodicalId":213742,"journal":{"name":"American Snobs","volume":"299 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Snobs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474475402.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 4 reads James’s 1898 essays on American Letters, The American Scene, ‘The Question of Our Speech’, and ‘Charles Eliot Norton’, alongside writing by Charles Eliot Norton and Charles William Eliot, among others. During the early years of the twentieth century, Harvard thinkers address questions about the political responsibilities and powers of the 'college-bred'; this chapter argues that James responds to this discussion about the cultivated elite (or what Matthew Arnold calls 'the remnant') by directing attention to that elite's private pleasures rather than its public responsibilities. Tracing across multiple texts James's articulation of an aesthetic that prizes difference, discrimination, delimitation, and exclusion, the chapter shows that he, like Edith Wharton, associates these desirable qualities with the social hierarchies of the Old World. Although his celebration of intricately shaded heterogeneity has been hailed as anti-nativist or progressive, his critical portrayal of white homogeneity can function to criticise not racism or nativism but rather the egalitarian democracy with which such whiteness was closely associated. In contrasting his own practice of culture against that of Norton's 'Puritan' type, James distances himself from that type's commitments to asceticism and moralizing, and also its lingering associations with radicalism, antislavery sentiment, and democracy.
普遍的白人:詹姆斯美国场景中的歧视与选择
第四章阅读詹姆斯1898年关于美国文学、美国场景、“我们演讲的问题”和“查尔斯·艾略特·诺顿”的文章,以及查尔斯·艾略特·诺顿和查尔斯·威廉·艾略特等人的作品。在20世纪早期,哈佛的思想家们探讨了有关“大学教养”的政治责任和权力的问题;本章认为,詹姆斯通过将注意力转向精英的私人享乐,而不是其公共责任,来回应关于有教养的精英(或马修·阿诺德所说的“残余”)的讨论。在多个文本中追溯詹姆斯对一种重视差异、歧视、界限和排斥的美学的阐述,这一章表明,他像伊迪丝·沃顿一样,将这些令人向往的品质与旧世界的社会等级联系在一起。尽管他对错综复杂的异质性的颂扬被誉为反本土主义者或进步主义者,但他对白人同质性的批判性描绘可以用来批评的不是种族主义或本土主义,而是与这种白人密切相关的平等主义民主。在将自己的文化实践与诺顿的“清教徒”类型进行对比时,詹姆斯将自己与这种类型的禁欲主义和道德化的承诺,以及与激进主义,反奴隶制情绪和民主的挥之不去的联系区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信