CONSULTATIVE DIMENSION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION'S MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE PROCESS: A LEVER FOR REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL RESILIENCE

Cezar Teclean, G. Drăgan
{"title":"CONSULTATIVE DIMENSION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION'S MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE PROCESS: A LEVER FOR REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL RESILIENCE","authors":"Cezar Teclean, G. Drăgan","doi":"10.24818/aras/2023/4/1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the environment of European bureaucracy starting from the research question regarding the role and place of consultative institutions (the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions) in the European institutional system. The purpose of our investigation is to explain the nature and functionality of the institutions mentioned in the multilevel governance architecture of the European Union (EU). To achieve the proposed objective, we analyse the condition of advisory institutions as actors/agents of the European structure through the prism of the rationalist current and then we argue, through the grid of social constructivism, that the institutions in question serve, through their consultative attribute, also a role of legitimising supranational legislation with subnational applicability in the EU, against the background of the precariousness of legislative powers at regional and local level. Our research identifies the way in which the consultative institutions of the EU legitimise the community legislative process, a context in which the results obtained show the existence of a significant discordance between the need for legislation at the regional level and the much undersized legislative attribute at this level as a result of the constitutional limitations of the member states. The specified phenomenon feeds an imperfect subsidiarity and a deficient proximity within the EU, for the remedy of which the feasible solution consists in improving the administrative-legal cohesion in the EU through a potential reconsolidation of the Union treaties, which would generate a more homogeneous distribution of the administrative-territorial devolution.","PeriodicalId":420869,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Administrative Sciences","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/aras/2023/4/1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the environment of European bureaucracy starting from the research question regarding the role and place of consultative institutions (the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions) in the European institutional system. The purpose of our investigation is to explain the nature and functionality of the institutions mentioned in the multilevel governance architecture of the European Union (EU). To achieve the proposed objective, we analyse the condition of advisory institutions as actors/agents of the European structure through the prism of the rationalist current and then we argue, through the grid of social constructivism, that the institutions in question serve, through their consultative attribute, also a role of legitimising supranational legislation with subnational applicability in the EU, against the background of the precariousness of legislative powers at regional and local level. Our research identifies the way in which the consultative institutions of the EU legitimise the community legislative process, a context in which the results obtained show the existence of a significant discordance between the need for legislation at the regional level and the much undersized legislative attribute at this level as a result of the constitutional limitations of the member states. The specified phenomenon feeds an imperfect subsidiarity and a deficient proximity within the EU, for the remedy of which the feasible solution consists in improving the administrative-legal cohesion in the EU through a potential reconsolidation of the Union treaties, which would generate a more homogeneous distribution of the administrative-territorial devolution.
欧盟多层次治理过程中的协商维度:监管和制度弹性的杠杆
本文从协商机构(欧洲经济和社会委员会和欧洲地区委员会)在欧洲制度体系中的作用和地位的研究问题出发,探讨了欧洲官僚主义的环境。我们调查的目的是解释欧盟(EU)多层次治理架构中提到的机构的性质和功能。为了实现所提出的目标,我们通过理性主义思潮的棱镜分析了咨询机构作为欧洲结构的行动者/代理人的条件,然后我们通过社会建构主义的网格论证,所讨论的机构通过其咨询属性,也起到了使超国家立法合法化的作用,在欧盟具有次国家适用性。在区域和地方一级立法权不稳定的背景下。我们的研究确定了欧盟协商机构使共同体立法过程合法化的方式,在这种背景下,所获得的结果表明,由于成员国的宪法限制,区域一级的立法需求与这一级别的立法属性之间存在着显著的不一致。这种特定的现象助长了欧盟内部不完美的辅助性和不足的接近性,为了补救这一问题,可行的解决方案包括通过对联盟条约的潜在重新整合来改善欧盟的行政-法律凝聚力,这将产生更均匀的行政-领土权力下放分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信