Encouraging Critical Thinking and Professional Reading with LiteracyBags

Jackie Greene, Linda Serro
{"title":"Encouraging Critical Thinking and Professional Reading with LiteracyBags","authors":"Jackie Greene, Linda Serro","doi":"10.2174/1874916X01509010065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students enrolled in college courses are typically expected to read one or more textbooks per course. While the course text may be comprehensive, the author's approach may be narrow in focus, disregarding diverse perspectives on the subject. In addition, the limited genre presented in textbooks (i.e., nonfiction, expository) is not likely to encourage a desire for professional reading in students. To address these issues, two faculty members incorporated a Literacy Bag Project into their education courses at both graduate and undergraduate levels. The Literacy Bag activity involves students reading diverse genres in a variety of texts throughout the semester. Students select a different book each week, read one chapter/section, and reflect on the reading via journal writing and/or verbal discussions. This study examined students' perception of the Literacy Bag activity, as well as impact on critical thinking and professional literacy. Results indicate students at both the graduate and undergraduate levels: (1) plan to continue professional reading beyond the course; (2) engage in critical thinking; (3) enjoyed the activity and recommended the activity continue to be implemented. Analysis of student responses identified critical themes for success with the Literacy Bag activity: choice, perspective sharing, motivation, and classroom applications.","PeriodicalId":297766,"journal":{"name":"The Open Communication Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874916X01509010065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Students enrolled in college courses are typically expected to read one or more textbooks per course. While the course text may be comprehensive, the author's approach may be narrow in focus, disregarding diverse perspectives on the subject. In addition, the limited genre presented in textbooks (i.e., nonfiction, expository) is not likely to encourage a desire for professional reading in students. To address these issues, two faculty members incorporated a Literacy Bag Project into their education courses at both graduate and undergraduate levels. The Literacy Bag activity involves students reading diverse genres in a variety of texts throughout the semester. Students select a different book each week, read one chapter/section, and reflect on the reading via journal writing and/or verbal discussions. This study examined students' perception of the Literacy Bag activity, as well as impact on critical thinking and professional literacy. Results indicate students at both the graduate and undergraduate levels: (1) plan to continue professional reading beyond the course; (2) engage in critical thinking; (3) enjoyed the activity and recommended the activity continue to be implemented. Analysis of student responses identified critical themes for success with the Literacy Bag activity: choice, perspective sharing, motivation, and classroom applications.
用识字袋鼓励批判性思维和专业阅读
参加大学课程的学生通常要求每门课程阅读一本或多本教科书。虽然课程文本可能是全面的,但作者的方法可能是狭隘的,忽视了对该主题的不同观点。此外,教科书中呈现的有限体裁(即非虚构、说明文)不太可能鼓励学生对专业阅读的渴望。为了解决这些问题,两位教师将扫盲袋项目纳入了研究生和本科生的教育课程中。“读写袋”活动要求学生在整个学期中阅读各种文本中的不同体裁。学生每周选择一本不同的书,阅读一章/部分,并通过日记写作和/或口头讨论来反思阅读。本研究考察了学生对识字袋活动的认知,以及对批判性思维和专业素养的影响。结果表明,研究生和本科阶段的学生:(1)计划在课程结束后继续进行专业阅读;(2)具有批判性思维;(3)喜欢活动,并推荐活动继续开展。对学生反应的分析确定了识字袋活动成功的关键主题:选择、观点分享、动机和课堂应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信