Improving Fraud Detection in An Imbalanced Class Distribution Using Different Oversampling Techniques

R. Qaddoura, Mariam M. Biltawi
{"title":"Improving Fraud Detection in An Imbalanced Class Distribution Using Different Oversampling Techniques","authors":"R. Qaddoura, Mariam M. Biltawi","doi":"10.1109/EICEEAI56378.2022.10050500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit card fraud detection is essential for financial institutions to avoid charging customers for items they did not purchase. Fraud detection can be implemented through ML by building a model trained on a dataset containing transactions with fraud and non-fraud classes. The dataset available for this task is usually highly imbalanced. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to conduct a comprehensive comparison between five oversampling techniques. The oversampling techniques are the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN), borderline1 SMOTE, borderline2 SMOTE, and Support Vector Machine SMOTE (SVM SMOTE) to generate an enhanced model which can solve the imbalanced problem. The comparison is conducted by computing the geometric mean, recall, precision, and F1-score of six machine learning models with and without applying oversampling. The ML models experimented with are logistic regression, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, naive Bayes, support vector machine, and decision tree. Experimental results show that the oversampling techniques have improved the models' performance.","PeriodicalId":426838,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Engineering Conference on Electrical, Energy, and Artificial Intelligence (EICEEAI)","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Engineering Conference on Electrical, Energy, and Artificial Intelligence (EICEEAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EICEEAI56378.2022.10050500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Credit card fraud detection is essential for financial institutions to avoid charging customers for items they did not purchase. Fraud detection can be implemented through ML by building a model trained on a dataset containing transactions with fraud and non-fraud classes. The dataset available for this task is usually highly imbalanced. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to conduct a comprehensive comparison between five oversampling techniques. The oversampling techniques are the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN), borderline1 SMOTE, borderline2 SMOTE, and Support Vector Machine SMOTE (SVM SMOTE) to generate an enhanced model which can solve the imbalanced problem. The comparison is conducted by computing the geometric mean, recall, precision, and F1-score of six machine learning models with and without applying oversampling. The ML models experimented with are logistic regression, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, naive Bayes, support vector machine, and decision tree. Experimental results show that the oversampling techniques have improved the models' performance.
利用不同过采样技术改进非平衡类分布中的欺诈检测
信用卡欺诈检测对于金融机构避免向客户收取他们没有购买的商品是必不可少的。欺诈检测可以通过ML实现,方法是在包含欺诈类和非欺诈类交易的数据集上构建一个模型。用于此任务的数据集通常是高度不平衡的。因此,本文的目的是对五种过采样技术进行全面比较。过采样技术包括合成少数派过采样技术(SMOTE)、自适应合成采样技术(ADASYN)、borderline1 SMOTE、borderline2 SMOTE和支持向量机SMOTE (SVM SMOTE),以生成一个增强模型来解决不平衡问题。通过计算有过采样和没有过采样的六种机器学习模型的几何平均值、召回率、精度和f1分数进行比较。实验的机器学习模型有逻辑回归、随机森林、k近邻、朴素贝叶斯、支持向量机和决策树。实验结果表明,过采样技术提高了模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信