An exploration of uncertainty information for segmentation quality assessment

K. Hoebel, V. Andrearczyk, Andrew L Beers, J. Patel, Ken Chang, A. Depeursinge, Henning Mueller, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
{"title":"An exploration of uncertainty information for segmentation quality assessment","authors":"K. Hoebel, V. Andrearczyk, Andrew L Beers, J. Patel, Ken Chang, A. Depeursinge, Henning Mueller, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer","doi":"10.1117/12.2548722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Including uncertainty information in the assessment of a segmentation of pathologic structures on medical images, offers the potential to increase trust into deep learning algorithms for the analysis of medical imaging. Here, we examine options to extract uncertainty information from deep learning segmentation models and the influence of the choice of cost functions on these uncertainty measures. To this end we train conventional UNets without dropout, deep UNet ensembles, and Monte-Carlo (MC) dropout UNets to segment lung nodules on low dose CT using either soft Dice or weighted categorical cross-entropy (wcc) as loss functions. We extract voxel-wise uncertainty information from UNet models based on softmax maximum probability and from deep ensembles and MC dropout UNets using mean voxel-wise entropy. Upon visual assessment, areas of high uncertainty are localized in the periphery of segmentations and are in good agreement with incorrectly labelled voxels. Furthermore, we evaluate how well uncertainty measures correlate with segmentation quality (Dice score). Mean uncertainty over the segmented region (Ulabelled) derived from conventional UNet models does not show a strong quantitative relationship with the Dice score (Spearman correlation coefficient of -0.45 for the soft Dice vs -0.64 for the wcc model respectively). By comparison, image-level uncertainty measures derived from soft Dice as well as wcc MC UNet and deep UNet ensemble models correlate well with the Dice score. In conclusion, using uncertainty information offers ways to assess segmentation quality fully automatically without access to ground truth. Models trained using weighted categorical cross-entropy offer more meaningful uncertainty information on a voxel-level.","PeriodicalId":300887,"journal":{"name":"Medical Imaging: Image Processing","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Imaging: Image Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2548722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Including uncertainty information in the assessment of a segmentation of pathologic structures on medical images, offers the potential to increase trust into deep learning algorithms for the analysis of medical imaging. Here, we examine options to extract uncertainty information from deep learning segmentation models and the influence of the choice of cost functions on these uncertainty measures. To this end we train conventional UNets without dropout, deep UNet ensembles, and Monte-Carlo (MC) dropout UNets to segment lung nodules on low dose CT using either soft Dice or weighted categorical cross-entropy (wcc) as loss functions. We extract voxel-wise uncertainty information from UNet models based on softmax maximum probability and from deep ensembles and MC dropout UNets using mean voxel-wise entropy. Upon visual assessment, areas of high uncertainty are localized in the periphery of segmentations and are in good agreement with incorrectly labelled voxels. Furthermore, we evaluate how well uncertainty measures correlate with segmentation quality (Dice score). Mean uncertainty over the segmented region (Ulabelled) derived from conventional UNet models does not show a strong quantitative relationship with the Dice score (Spearman correlation coefficient of -0.45 for the soft Dice vs -0.64 for the wcc model respectively). By comparison, image-level uncertainty measures derived from soft Dice as well as wcc MC UNet and deep UNet ensemble models correlate well with the Dice score. In conclusion, using uncertainty information offers ways to assess segmentation quality fully automatically without access to ground truth. Models trained using weighted categorical cross-entropy offer more meaningful uncertainty information on a voxel-level.
不确定信息在分割质量评价中的应用
在医学图像的病理结构分割评估中包含不确定性信息,有可能增加对医学成像分析的深度学习算法的信任。在这里,我们研究了从深度学习分割模型中提取不确定性信息的选项,以及成本函数的选择对这些不确定性度量的影响。为此,我们使用软Dice或加权分类交叉熵(wcc)作为损失函数,训练无dropout的常规UNet、深度UNet集成和蒙特卡罗(MC) dropout UNet来分割低剂量CT上的肺结节。我们基于softmax最大概率从UNet模型中提取体素不确定性信息,并使用平均体素熵从深度集成和MC dropout UNet中提取体素不确定性信息。根据视觉评估,高度不确定的区域定位在分割的外围,并且与错误标记的体素很好地一致。此外,我们评估了不确定性度量与分割质量(Dice分数)的相关性。来自传统UNet模型的分割区域(ulabel)的平均不确定性与Dice评分没有很强的定量关系(软Dice的Spearman相关系数为-0.45,而wcc模型的Spearman相关系数分别为-0.64)。通过比较,从软Dice以及wcc MC UNet和深度UNet集成模型得出的图像级不确定性测量与Dice得分有很好的相关性。综上所述,使用不确定度信息提供了在不获取真实情况的情况下完全自动评估分割质量的方法。使用加权分类交叉熵训练的模型在体素水平上提供更有意义的不确定性信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书