Learning from each other: Reciprocity in description between Wikipedians and librarians

Angela Yon, E. Willey
{"title":"Learning from each other: Reciprocity in description between Wikipedians and librarians","authors":"Angela Yon, E. Willey","doi":"10.3998/mpub.11778416.ch19.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Librarians, archivists, and museum professionals are increasingly realizing the value of using and contributing information to Wikipedia through projects such as edit-a-thons and the 1Lib1Ref project. As the amount of knowledge in Wikipedia and Wikidata grows, the benefits to libraries in partnering with Wikimedia projects to enhance their own bibliographic records and catalog search results also increase. Conversely, librarians have created an immense number of bibliographic and authority records that Wikipedia and Wikidata editors can use both as resources in and of themselves and as examples of various approaches to metadata and knowledge creation. Despite some challenges there are numerous benefits for working to integrate library data with Wikipedia more closely. This chapter will serve to highlight differences between Wikipedia resources and library catalog records, and how librarians and Wikipedians can learn from each other to improve description and discoverability in both Wikipedia and library catalogs for their respective users. It will also illustrate differences between these two systems in order to reduce confusion and errors when data are merged uncritically. The discussion draws on experience gained from a previous Illinois State University Research Grant-funded project that used the Wikipedia List of African-American writers to enhance library catalog records.","PeriodicalId":142704,"journal":{"name":"Wikipedia and Academic Libraries","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wikipedia and Academic Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11778416.ch19.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Librarians, archivists, and museum professionals are increasingly realizing the value of using and contributing information to Wikipedia through projects such as edit-a-thons and the 1Lib1Ref project. As the amount of knowledge in Wikipedia and Wikidata grows, the benefits to libraries in partnering with Wikimedia projects to enhance their own bibliographic records and catalog search results also increase. Conversely, librarians have created an immense number of bibliographic and authority records that Wikipedia and Wikidata editors can use both as resources in and of themselves and as examples of various approaches to metadata and knowledge creation. Despite some challenges there are numerous benefits for working to integrate library data with Wikipedia more closely. This chapter will serve to highlight differences between Wikipedia resources and library catalog records, and how librarians and Wikipedians can learn from each other to improve description and discoverability in both Wikipedia and library catalogs for their respective users. It will also illustrate differences between these two systems in order to reduce confusion and errors when data are merged uncritically. The discussion draws on experience gained from a previous Illinois State University Research Grant-funded project that used the Wikipedia List of African-American writers to enhance library catalog records.
相互学习:维基人和图书馆员在描述上的互惠
图书管理员、档案管理员和博物馆专业人员越来越意识到通过编辑马拉松和1Lib1Ref项目等项目使用和贡献维基百科信息的价值。随着维基百科和维基数据中知识的增长,图书馆通过与维基媒体项目合作来增强他们自己的书目记录和目录搜索结果的好处也在增加。相反,图书馆员已经创建了大量的书目和权威记录,维基百科和维基数据的编辑可以将其作为资源和自己的资源,也可以作为各种元数据和知识创造方法的例子。尽管存在一些挑战,但将图书馆数据与维基百科更紧密地集成还是有很多好处的。本章将强调维基百科资源和图书馆目录记录之间的差异,以及图书馆员和维基人如何相互学习,以改善维基百科和图书馆目录中各自用户的描述和可发现性。它还将说明这两个系统之间的差异,以减少在不加批判地合并数据时的混乱和错误。这次讨论借鉴了以前伊利诺伊州立大学研究基金资助的一个项目的经验,该项目利用维基百科的非裔美国作家名单来增强图书馆目录记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信