Multi-Objective Test Case Selection: A study of the influence of the Catfish effect on PSO based strategies

Luciano S. de Souza, R. Prudêncio, F. Barros
{"title":"Multi-Objective Test Case Selection: A study of the influence of the Catfish effect on PSO based strategies","authors":"Luciano S. de Souza, R. Prudêncio, F. Barros","doi":"10.5753/wtf.2014.22943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the software testing process many test suites can be generated in order to evaluate and assure the quality of the products. In some cases, the execution of all suites can not fit the available resources (time, people, etc). Hence, automatic Test Case (TC) selection could be used to reduce the suites based on some selection criterion. This process can be treated as an optimization problem, aiming to find a subset of TCs which optimizes one or more objective functions (i.e., selection criteria). In this light, we developed mechanisms for TC selection in context of structural and functional testing. The proposed algorithms consider two objectives simultaneously: maximize branch coverage (or functional requirements coverage) while minimizing execution cost (time). These mechanisms were implemented by deploying multi-objective techniques based on Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Additionally, we added the so-called catfish effect into the multi-objective selection algorithms in order to improve their results. The performed experiments revealed the feasibility of the proposed strategies.","PeriodicalId":321409,"journal":{"name":"Anais do XV Workshop de Testes e Tolerância a Falhas (WTF 2014)","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do XV Workshop de Testes e Tolerância a Falhas (WTF 2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/wtf.2014.22943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

During the software testing process many test suites can be generated in order to evaluate and assure the quality of the products. In some cases, the execution of all suites can not fit the available resources (time, people, etc). Hence, automatic Test Case (TC) selection could be used to reduce the suites based on some selection criterion. This process can be treated as an optimization problem, aiming to find a subset of TCs which optimizes one or more objective functions (i.e., selection criteria). In this light, we developed mechanisms for TC selection in context of structural and functional testing. The proposed algorithms consider two objectives simultaneously: maximize branch coverage (or functional requirements coverage) while minimizing execution cost (time). These mechanisms were implemented by deploying multi-objective techniques based on Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Additionally, we added the so-called catfish effect into the multi-objective selection algorithms in order to improve their results. The performed experiments revealed the feasibility of the proposed strategies.
多目标测试案例选择:鲶鱼效应对基于PSO策略的影响研究
在软件测试过程中,为了评估和保证产品的质量,可以生成许多测试套件。在某些情况下,所有套件的执行不适合可用的资源(时间、人员等)。因此,自动测试用例(TC)选择可以用于基于一些选择标准来减少套件。这个过程可以被视为一个优化问题,旨在找到一个优化一个或多个目标函数(即选择标准)的tc子集。有鉴于此,我们在结构和功能测试的背景下开发了TC选择机制。所提出的算法同时考虑两个目标:最大化分支覆盖(或功能需求覆盖),同时最小化执行成本(时间)。这些机制通过基于粒子群优化(PSO)的多目标技术实现。此外,我们在多目标选择算法中加入了所谓的鲶鱼效应,以改善其结果。实验结果表明了所提策略的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信