The Emotional Experience of Sustainability Courses: Learned Eco-Anxiety, Potential Ontological Adjustment

P. Graham, C. Kuyvenhoven, R. Upitis, Adeela Arshad-Ayaz, Eli Scheinman, Colin Khan, A. Goebel, R. S. Brown, A. Hovorka
{"title":"The Emotional Experience of Sustainability Courses: Learned Eco-Anxiety, Potential Ontological Adjustment","authors":"P. Graham, C. Kuyvenhoven, R. Upitis, Adeela Arshad-Ayaz, Eli Scheinman, Colin Khan, A. Goebel, R. S. Brown, A. Hovorka","doi":"10.1177/0973408220981163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The knowledge content of university-level introductory sustainability courses elicits emotional reactions by students that are novel within the typical classroom context. Common negative reactions include ‘sadness’, ‘worry’, ‘guilt’ and ‘disgust’, while more positive responses include ‘feeling angry’, ‘empowered’, ‘like trying to make a difference’ or ‘having raised awareness’. These emotions are indexical of a deeper social epistemic collision between historically established social identities, including behavioural scripts consistent with, and generative of, unsustainability on the one hand, and a growing collective awareness of the consequent unsustainability that threatens students’ future well-being on the other. The authors argue that introductory sustainability courses set up the potential for not only a learned eco-anxiety, but also an ontological adjustment. That adjustment might bring student, historical inheritance and environment from a state of living in a suffering, but still separate, world to a practice of becoming with a world into which we extend and that also extends into us. Therefore, it is arguably important for instructors to be aware of the possibility of students getting into a negative state of eco-anxiety and for instructors to also have some tools for supporting a more positive ontological adjustment. We recommend that they become skilled in facilitating transformational learning by including some discussions about the ontology of self in any introductory sustainability instruction. Directing students’ attention to their own emotional responses can also be useful for grounding such classroom discussions and transformational learning.","PeriodicalId":177225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Sustainable Development","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408220981163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The knowledge content of university-level introductory sustainability courses elicits emotional reactions by students that are novel within the typical classroom context. Common negative reactions include ‘sadness’, ‘worry’, ‘guilt’ and ‘disgust’, while more positive responses include ‘feeling angry’, ‘empowered’, ‘like trying to make a difference’ or ‘having raised awareness’. These emotions are indexical of a deeper social epistemic collision between historically established social identities, including behavioural scripts consistent with, and generative of, unsustainability on the one hand, and a growing collective awareness of the consequent unsustainability that threatens students’ future well-being on the other. The authors argue that introductory sustainability courses set up the potential for not only a learned eco-anxiety, but also an ontological adjustment. That adjustment might bring student, historical inheritance and environment from a state of living in a suffering, but still separate, world to a practice of becoming with a world into which we extend and that also extends into us. Therefore, it is arguably important for instructors to be aware of the possibility of students getting into a negative state of eco-anxiety and for instructors to also have some tools for supporting a more positive ontological adjustment. We recommend that they become skilled in facilitating transformational learning by including some discussions about the ontology of self in any introductory sustainability instruction. Directing students’ attention to their own emotional responses can also be useful for grounding such classroom discussions and transformational learning.
可持续性课程的情绪体验:习得性生态焦虑、潜在本体论调整
大学水平的可持续发展入门课程的知识内容引发了学生在典型课堂环境中新颖的情绪反应。常见的消极反应包括“悲伤”、“担心”、“内疚”和“厌恶”,而更积极的反应包括“感到愤怒”、“有力量”、“想要有所作为”或“提高了意识”。这些情绪是历史上建立的社会身份之间更深层次的社会认知冲突的指标,一方面包括与不可持续性一致的行为脚本,以及不可持续性的生成,另一方面,对随之而来的不可持续性威胁学生未来福祉的日益增长的集体意识。作者认为,可持续性入门课程不仅为习得的生态焦虑提供了可能,而且还为本体论调整提供了可能。这种调整可能会使学生、历史遗产和环境从一种生活在一个痛苦但仍然分离的世界中的状态,转变为一种实践,即与一个我们延伸到其中的世界融为一体,而这个世界也延伸到我们身上。因此,对于教师来说,重要的是要意识到学生进入消极生态焦虑状态的可能性,并且教师也要有一些工具来支持更积极的本体论调整。我们建议他们在任何介绍性的可持续性教学中加入一些关于自我本体论的讨论,从而熟练地促进转化学习。将学生的注意力引导到他们自己的情绪反应上,对于课堂讨论和转型学习的基础也很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信