Strategy to implement RapidArc® using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma

Arun Chairmadurai 1, H. Goel, V. Ganesan, Vikraman Subramani 1, Sandeep Kumar Jain 1, Vikash Kumar 1
{"title":"Strategy to implement RapidArc® using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma","authors":"Arun Chairmadurai 1, H. Goel, V. Ganesan, Vikraman Subramani 1, Sandeep Kumar Jain 1, Vikash Kumar 1","doi":"10.24294/IRR.V0I0.535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare the utility of RapidArc® technique with mono or dual isocentre using high-definition 120 multileaf collimator (HD120™MLC) for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph node (PALN) in cervical carcinoma.Methods: Ten patients having more than 22-cm treatment target length were delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions by RapidArc® technique using mono or dual isocenter. Dose distribution characteristics were monitored using various indices. Doses to critical organs were also compared for the sparing effects.Results: Conformity and dose-gradient indices for mono or dual isocenter plans were comparable. However, mono-isocentric plan decreased the heterogeneity index (0.07±0.01) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (0.08±0.01; p<0.05). Mean and maximal doses to various critical organs remained comparable. The mean dose to bowel bag was significantly reduced (p<0.05) in mono-isocentric plan (18.78±5.18 Gy) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (19.20±5.27 Gy). Mono-isocentric plan required 1.3 times higher exposure time than the dual-isocentric plans but reduced the overall treatment time by eliminating intra-fraction patient shift that is inevitable in dual isocenter plan.Discussion: Feasibility of mono-isocentric RapidArc® plan using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and PALN relied on ‘Maximum Leaf Span’, which restricted the ‘leading-leaf’ to surpass the ‘trailing-leaf’ beyond 15-cm. This difficulty was overcome by truncating the field size and fixing the jaws at dedicated positions in mono-isocentric plan.Conclusion: The strategy used in mono-isocentric plan enhanced the utility of RapidArc® using HD120™MLC and also minimized the intra-fraction set-up variations and overall treatment time.","PeriodicalId":153727,"journal":{"name":"Imaging and Radiation Research","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging and Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24294/IRR.V0I0.535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the utility of RapidArc® technique with mono or dual isocentre using high-definition 120 multileaf collimator (HD120™MLC) for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph node (PALN) in cervical carcinoma.Methods: Ten patients having more than 22-cm treatment target length were delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions by RapidArc® technique using mono or dual isocenter. Dose distribution characteristics were monitored using various indices. Doses to critical organs were also compared for the sparing effects.Results: Conformity and dose-gradient indices for mono or dual isocenter plans were comparable. However, mono-isocentric plan decreased the heterogeneity index (0.07±0.01) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (0.08±0.01; p<0.05). Mean and maximal doses to various critical organs remained comparable. The mean dose to bowel bag was significantly reduced (p<0.05) in mono-isocentric plan (18.78±5.18 Gy) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (19.20±5.27 Gy). Mono-isocentric plan required 1.3 times higher exposure time than the dual-isocentric plans but reduced the overall treatment time by eliminating intra-fraction patient shift that is inevitable in dual isocenter plan.Discussion: Feasibility of mono-isocentric RapidArc® plan using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and PALN relied on ‘Maximum Leaf Span’, which restricted the ‘leading-leaf’ to surpass the ‘trailing-leaf’ beyond 15-cm. This difficulty was overcome by truncating the field size and fixing the jaws at dedicated positions in mono-isocentric plan.Conclusion: The strategy used in mono-isocentric plan enhanced the utility of RapidArc® using HD120™MLC and also minimized the intra-fraction set-up variations and overall treatment time.
使用HD120™MLC对宫颈癌患者的全骨盆和下主动脉旁淋巴结实施RapidArc的策略
目的:比较RapidArc®技术与单中心或双中心高清120多叶准直仪(HD120™MLC)在宫颈癌全骨盆和下主动脉旁淋巴结(PALN)照射中的应用。方法:10例治疗靶长度大于22cm的患者,采用RapidArc®技术,采用单中心或双中心给药,分25次给药45 Gy。采用多种指标监测剂量分布特征。对关键器官的剂量也进行了节约效果的比较。结果:单、双等中心方案的一致性和剂量梯度指标具有可比性。但单等心计划较双等心计划(0.08±0.01)降低异质性指数(0.07±0.01);p < 0.05)。各关键器官的平均剂量和最大剂量保持可比性。单等心计划对肠袋的平均剂量(18.78±5.18 Gy)较双等心计划(19.20±5.27 Gy)显著降低(p<0.05)。单等心计划所需的暴露时间是双等心计划的1.3倍,但通过消除双等心计划中不可避免的患者内移位,减少了总体治疗时间。讨论:单等心RapidArc计划使用HD120™MLC照射整个骨盆和PALN的可行性依赖于“最大叶跨度”,这限制了“前叶”超过“尾叶”超过15厘米。通过截断井眼尺寸并将钳口固定在单等心平面的专用位置,克服了这一困难。结论:单等心计划中使用的策略增强了使用HD120™MLC的RapidArc®的效用,并且还最小化了分数内设置变化和总体治疗时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信