KAJIAN YURIDIS FUNGSI PENCEGAHAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA SECARA ELEKTRONIK DI PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA

Mahardika, Firman Wijaya
{"title":"KAJIAN YURIDIS FUNGSI PENCEGAHAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA SECARA ELEKTRONIK DI PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA","authors":"Mahardika, Firman Wijaya","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Indonesia, corruption is rampant in the procurement of goods and services. The institution authorized to deal with corruption is the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). One of the tasks of the Corruption Eradication Commission is to carry out surveillance and preventive actions so that there are not many corruption cases that can harm the country but the prevention function has not been maximally implemented. Therefore, the author proposes the issue of how is the juridical study of Corruption Eradication Commission’s preventive function in eradicating corruption of the electronic procurement of goods and services in DKI Jakarta province? The author analizes the problem using normative research methods, with the technique of research legislation approaches. Corruption in the procurement of goods and services is very widespread because there are still gaps or weaknesses used to commit corruption. Existing weaknesses include regulation, principles in procurement of goods and services, supervision, and implementation of procurement of goods and services. Likewise, the implementation of KPK in terms of prevention is still lacking. The KPK should be an institution tasked with eradicating corruption. In addition to supervision, the KPK should prioritize implementing prevention so that corruption does not occur. The thing that can be done by KPK includes tightening supervision in the procurement of goods and services.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Indonesia, corruption is rampant in the procurement of goods and services. The institution authorized to deal with corruption is the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). One of the tasks of the Corruption Eradication Commission is to carry out surveillance and preventive actions so that there are not many corruption cases that can harm the country but the prevention function has not been maximally implemented. Therefore, the author proposes the issue of how is the juridical study of Corruption Eradication Commission’s preventive function in eradicating corruption of the electronic procurement of goods and services in DKI Jakarta province? The author analizes the problem using normative research methods, with the technique of research legislation approaches. Corruption in the procurement of goods and services is very widespread because there are still gaps or weaknesses used to commit corruption. Existing weaknesses include regulation, principles in procurement of goods and services, supervision, and implementation of procurement of goods and services. Likewise, the implementation of KPK in terms of prevention is still lacking. The KPK should be an institution tasked with eradicating corruption. In addition to supervision, the KPK should prioritize implementing prevention so that corruption does not occur. The thing that can be done by KPK includes tightening supervision in the procurement of goods and services.
这是一项关于防盗腐败委员会的审查,该委员会正在雅加达DKI省打击电子商品和服务的刑事腐败行为
在印尼,商品和服务采购中的腐败现象十分猖獗。被授权处理腐败的机构是铲除腐败委员会。根除腐败委员会的任务之一是开展监督和预防行动,以便不会有许多可能危害国家的腐败案件,但预防职能尚未得到最大限度的落实。因此,笔者提出了在DKI雅加达省消除腐败委员会预防商品和服务电子采购腐败的司法研究是如何进行的。笔者运用规范性研究方法,运用研究性立法方法对问题进行分析。在采购货物和服务方面的腐败现象非常普遍,因为仍然存在被用来实施腐败的漏洞或弱点。现有的弱点包括货物和服务采购的监管、原则、监督和实施。同样,KPK在预防方面的实施仍然缺乏。肃贪委员会应该是一个负责根除腐败的机构。除了监督外,肃贪委员会还应优先实施预防措施,以防止腐败发生。KPK可以做的事情包括加强对货物和服务采购的监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信