Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and fertility preservation in breast cancer treatment

Sara Hosseinzadeh
{"title":"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and fertility preservation in breast cancer treatment","authors":"Sara Hosseinzadeh","doi":"10.37707/jnds.v3i1.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breast cancer accounts for the majority of cancers in women worldwide, and the most common cancer overall in the UK. It is typically treated by a combination of surgical and medical therapies, which commonly include neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy alongside surgery in the treatment of breast cancer confers no overall and disease-free survival advantage. Nonetheless, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is commonly favoured as a first line therapy for breast cancer. The case reported illustrates the potential for fertility considerations to delay treatment where neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the first line treatment for an operable, non-metastatic breast cancer. Here, the time taken for the patient to reach a decision on fertility preservation resulted in significant delays to treatment which, had surgery been chosen as the first line treatment, would have been prevented. This report discusses the evidence for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy alongside surgery in breast cancer treatment, and concludes that due to the comparable overall and disease-free survival rate, as well as the continuing upward trend in the average age of primigravida in the UK, fertility considerations present a strong argument in favour of surgery as first line therapy for non-metastatic, operable breast cancer, in favour of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ","PeriodicalId":184356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37707/jnds.v3i1.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer accounts for the majority of cancers in women worldwide, and the most common cancer overall in the UK. It is typically treated by a combination of surgical and medical therapies, which commonly include neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy alongside surgery in the treatment of breast cancer confers no overall and disease-free survival advantage. Nonetheless, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is commonly favoured as a first line therapy for breast cancer. The case reported illustrates the potential for fertility considerations to delay treatment where neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the first line treatment for an operable, non-metastatic breast cancer. Here, the time taken for the patient to reach a decision on fertility preservation resulted in significant delays to treatment which, had surgery been chosen as the first line treatment, would have been prevented. This report discusses the evidence for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy alongside surgery in breast cancer treatment, and concludes that due to the comparable overall and disease-free survival rate, as well as the continuing upward trend in the average age of primigravida in the UK, fertility considerations present a strong argument in favour of surgery as first line therapy for non-metastatic, operable breast cancer, in favour of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 
新辅助化疗和保留生育能力在乳腺癌治疗中的应用
乳腺癌占全球女性癌症的大多数,也是英国最常见的癌症。它通常通过手术和药物治疗相结合来治疗,通常包括新辅助和/或辅助化疗。在乳腺癌的治疗中,新辅助化疗与辅助化疗联合手术没有总体和无病生存优势。尽管如此,新辅助化疗通常是首选的一线治疗乳腺癌。报告的病例说明了生育方面的考虑可能会延迟治疗,新辅助化疗是可手术的非转移性乳腺癌的一线治疗。在这里,患者决定是否保留生育能力所花费的时间导致了治疗的严重延误,如果选择手术作为第一线治疗,就可以避免这种情况。本报告讨论了在乳腺癌治疗中,新辅助化疗优于辅助化疗和手术的证据,并得出结论:由于英国的总体生存率和无病生存率相当,以及初产妇平均年龄持续上升的趋势,考虑到生育能力,手术是支持非转移性、可手术乳腺癌的一线治疗的有力论据,支持新辅助化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信