Collaborating to Know?: Interorganizational Engagement and Learning

C. Huxham, P. Hibbert
{"title":"Collaborating to Know?: Interorganizational Engagement and Learning","authors":"C. Huxham, P. Hibbert","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1306956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We approached the considerable body of literature on learning in collaborative situations in order to explore the possibility of pulling the separate strands into a broad conceptual framework which might offer new insights. The literature focus in the framework was deliberately upon the interorganizational field, although we do touch upon some more general issues related to organizational learning and knowledge where these help to elucidate key questions. Our aim in doing so was to explore whether such a framework might have: utility as a guide for empirical work; some validity in its own right; or a combination of these possibilities. We worked with the literature through processes of collation, synthesis and interpretive reasoning. This mapping and consequent exploration of the terrain led to the development of a framework conceptualising the processes of learning in collaborative situations. The central elements of the framework are attitudes to learning, the characteristics of collaborative learning situations and learning outcomes. We found that this framework allowed us to infer patterns of engagement between partners and learning situations. This in turn helped to describe, and perhaps begin to explain, the different learning trajectories suggested in our reading of the literature. In presenting the framework and elaborating the learning trajectories here, we seek to engage in discussion about the extent to which these might be useful in empirical and theoretical contexts.","PeriodicalId":179046,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Leveraging Cross-Boundary Knowledge (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORG: Leveraging Cross-Boundary Knowledge (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We approached the considerable body of literature on learning in collaborative situations in order to explore the possibility of pulling the separate strands into a broad conceptual framework which might offer new insights. The literature focus in the framework was deliberately upon the interorganizational field, although we do touch upon some more general issues related to organizational learning and knowledge where these help to elucidate key questions. Our aim in doing so was to explore whether such a framework might have: utility as a guide for empirical work; some validity in its own right; or a combination of these possibilities. We worked with the literature through processes of collation, synthesis and interpretive reasoning. This mapping and consequent exploration of the terrain led to the development of a framework conceptualising the processes of learning in collaborative situations. The central elements of the framework are attitudes to learning, the characteristics of collaborative learning situations and learning outcomes. We found that this framework allowed us to infer patterns of engagement between partners and learning situations. This in turn helped to describe, and perhaps begin to explain, the different learning trajectories suggested in our reading of the literature. In presenting the framework and elaborating the learning trajectories here, we seek to engage in discussion about the extent to which these might be useful in empirical and theoretical contexts.
合作了解?:组织间参与和学习
我们查阅了大量关于合作情境下学习的文献,以探索将这些独立的线索纳入一个可能提供新见解的广泛概念框架的可能性。尽管我们确实触及了一些与组织学习和知识相关的更一般的问题,但该框架中的文献重点故意放在组织间领域,这些问题有助于阐明关键问题。我们这样做的目的是探索这样一个框架是否可能具有:作为实证工作指南的效用;有其自身的有效性;或者是这些可能性的组合。我们通过整理、综合和解释推理的过程来处理文献。这种映射和随后对地形的探索导致了一个框架的发展,这个框架将协作情况下的学习过程概念化。该框架的核心要素是学习态度、协作学习情境的特征和学习成果。我们发现这个框架使我们能够推断出合作伙伴和学习情境之间的参与模式。这反过来有助于描述,也许开始解释,在我们阅读的文献中提出的不同的学习轨迹。在介绍框架和详细阐述学习轨迹时,我们试图参与讨论这些框架在实证和理论背景下可能有用的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信