“Always Symmetrize!: Forging Bonds in Heart of Darkness”

T. Cousineau
{"title":"“Always Symmetrize!: Forging Bonds in Heart of Darkness”","authors":"T. Cousineau","doi":"10.2478/ewcp-2021-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Always Symmetrize!,” the title of this essay – which echoes Fredric Jameson’s better-known admonition to “always historicize” – alludes to a type of literary analysis, inspired by the Chilean psychoanalyst Ignacio Matte Blanco’s concept of “symmetric logic,” which I have been working on for several years. Briefly, it treats the makers of literary monuments as engaged – like the alchemists discussed by Mircea Eliade in The Forge and The Crucible – in the task of perfecting the work of nature, a project that they pursue under the guidance of what I call the “symmetrical imperative.” The “unsurpassable horizon” of this literary endeavor is Homer’s Iliad, whose perfectly achieved, albeit covert, bilateral symmetry (magisterially detailed by Cedric Whitman in his classic Homer and The Heroic Tradition) is made overt in the undisputed masterpiece of Greek geometrical pottery – Exekias’s amphora, “Achilles and Ajax Playing Dice,” which I discuss briefly at the outset of my essay. The greater part of this essay is devoted to an analysis of the similarly covert workings of the symmetrical imperative in Joseph Conrad’s modernist masterpiece Heart of Darkness. In the initial phases of this “alchemical process,” Conrad treats as symmetrical the two otherwise asymmetrical stages of Marlow’s journey (first to the Central Station and then to the Inner Station). In its second phase, he creates a container within which to contain this pairing of symmetrized episodes in the form of a narrative whose covert bilateral symmetry achieves, as Fernando Pessoa recommends in The Book of Disquiet, “a realization freed from the taint of reality” (30). Having completed my analysis of this twofold alchemical process in Heart of Darkness, I then devote a few concluding pages to its return in “The Secret Sharer,” a short-story which Conrad wrote several years after publishing Heart of Darkness, and in which he may well have “perfected the work of nature” even more impressively.","PeriodicalId":120501,"journal":{"name":"East-West Cultural Passage","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East-West Cultural Passage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ewcp-2021-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract “Always Symmetrize!,” the title of this essay – which echoes Fredric Jameson’s better-known admonition to “always historicize” – alludes to a type of literary analysis, inspired by the Chilean psychoanalyst Ignacio Matte Blanco’s concept of “symmetric logic,” which I have been working on for several years. Briefly, it treats the makers of literary monuments as engaged – like the alchemists discussed by Mircea Eliade in The Forge and The Crucible – in the task of perfecting the work of nature, a project that they pursue under the guidance of what I call the “symmetrical imperative.” The “unsurpassable horizon” of this literary endeavor is Homer’s Iliad, whose perfectly achieved, albeit covert, bilateral symmetry (magisterially detailed by Cedric Whitman in his classic Homer and The Heroic Tradition) is made overt in the undisputed masterpiece of Greek geometrical pottery – Exekias’s amphora, “Achilles and Ajax Playing Dice,” which I discuss briefly at the outset of my essay. The greater part of this essay is devoted to an analysis of the similarly covert workings of the symmetrical imperative in Joseph Conrad’s modernist masterpiece Heart of Darkness. In the initial phases of this “alchemical process,” Conrad treats as symmetrical the two otherwise asymmetrical stages of Marlow’s journey (first to the Central Station and then to the Inner Station). In its second phase, he creates a container within which to contain this pairing of symmetrized episodes in the form of a narrative whose covert bilateral symmetry achieves, as Fernando Pessoa recommends in The Book of Disquiet, “a realization freed from the taint of reality” (30). Having completed my analysis of this twofold alchemical process in Heart of Darkness, I then devote a few concluding pages to its return in “The Secret Sharer,” a short-story which Conrad wrote several years after publishing Heart of Darkness, and in which he may well have “perfected the work of nature” even more impressively.
“总是使相称!《在黑暗之心锻造纽带》
“永远对称!”,这篇文章的标题——呼应了弗雷德里克·詹姆逊(Fredric Jameson)更为人所知的“永远要历史化”的告诫——暗指一种文学分析,灵感来自智利精神分析学家伊格纳西奥·马特·布兰科(Ignacio Matte Blanco)的“对称逻辑”概念,我已经研究了好几年。简而言之,它把文学纪念碑的制造者视为参与的——就像米尔恰·伊利亚德在《熔炉和坩埚》中讨论的炼金术士一样——在完善自然的工作中,他们在我所谓的“对称命令”的指导下进行的一项工程。这种文学努力的“不可超越的地平线”是荷马的《伊利亚特》,它完美地实现了,尽管是隐秘的,双边对称(塞德里克·惠特曼在他的经典作品《荷马与英雄传统》中对其进行了权威的详细描述),在希腊几何陶器的无可争议的杰作中——埃克塞基亚的双耳罐,“阿喀琉斯和阿贾克斯玩骰子”中,我在文章的开头简要地讨论了这一点。本文的大部分都致力于分析约瑟夫·康拉德的现代主义杰作《黑暗之心》中对称命令的类似隐蔽作用。在这个“炼金术过程”的最初阶段,康拉德把马洛旅程的两个不对称阶段(首先到中央车站,然后到内站)视为对称的。在第二阶段,他创造了一个容器,其中包含了这对对称的情节,以一种叙事的形式,其隐蔽的双边对称达到了费尔南多·佩索阿在《不安之书》中建议的“从现实的污点中解脱出来的实现”(30)。在《黑暗之心》中完成了对这一双重炼金术过程的分析之后,我将在《秘密分享者》(The Secret Sharer)中花几页来总结它的回归。《秘密分享者》是康拉德在出版《黑暗之心》几年后写的一篇短篇小说,在这篇小说中,他很可能更令人印象深刻地“完善了自然的工作”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信