An Empirical Study of Distributed Technologies Used in Collaborative Tasks at Statoil ASA

Anita Gupta, Marianne H. Asperheim, Odd Petter N. Slyngstad, Harald Rønneberg
{"title":"An Empirical Study of Distributed Technologies Used in Collaborative Tasks at Statoil ASA","authors":"Anita Gupta, Marianne H. Asperheim, Odd Petter N. Slyngstad, Harald Rønneberg","doi":"10.1109/COLCOM.2006.361842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents results of a survey, related to the theoretical task-technology-fitness framework. The survey was conducted in a large Oil and Gas company in Norway, namely Statoil ASA. The task-technology-fitness framework indicates which groups of medium or technology are appropriate to choose according to the task to be performed, when collaborating with others. We have here presented the extended version of the task-technology-fitness framework, according to how Statoil ASA's employees use SMS, e-mail, instant messaging and audio (phone call), in different collaborative tasks. In total, there were 333 out of 747 respondents who participated in the survey. The results reveal that SMS and Instant Messaging are not seen as efficient or well suited communication channels for collaborative tasks. E-mail seems to be favorable among the respondents for the collaborative tasks, while audio (phone call) follows closely. The results are important in that they indicate when SMS, e-mail, instant messaging and audio (phone call) are appropriate to use. The purpose of the survey was to discover potential area of improvements for Statoil ASA","PeriodicalId":315775,"journal":{"name":"2006 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2006.361842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents results of a survey, related to the theoretical task-technology-fitness framework. The survey was conducted in a large Oil and Gas company in Norway, namely Statoil ASA. The task-technology-fitness framework indicates which groups of medium or technology are appropriate to choose according to the task to be performed, when collaborating with others. We have here presented the extended version of the task-technology-fitness framework, according to how Statoil ASA's employees use SMS, e-mail, instant messaging and audio (phone call), in different collaborative tasks. In total, there were 333 out of 747 respondents who participated in the survey. The results reveal that SMS and Instant Messaging are not seen as efficient or well suited communication channels for collaborative tasks. E-mail seems to be favorable among the respondents for the collaborative tasks, while audio (phone call) follows closely. The results are important in that they indicate when SMS, e-mail, instant messaging and audio (phone call) are appropriate to use. The purpose of the survey was to discover potential area of improvements for Statoil ASA
挪威国家石油公司协同任务中分布式技术的实证研究
本文提出了一项关于理论任务-技术-适应性框架的调查结果。这项调查是在挪威的一家大型石油和天然气公司,即Statoil ASA进行的。任务-技术-适应性框架表明,在与他人合作时,根据要执行的任务选择哪组媒介或技术是合适的。根据Statoil ASA的员工在不同的协作任务中使用短信、电子邮件、即时消息和音频(电话)的情况,我们在这里展示了任务-技术-健身框架的扩展版本。在747名受访者中,共有333人参与了调查。研究结果显示,SMS和即时通讯并不被视为高效或适合协作任务的通信渠道。在协作任务中,电子邮件似乎更受受访者青睐,而音频(电话)紧随其后。研究结果很重要,因为它们表明什么时候使用短信、电子邮件、即时消息和音频(电话)是合适的。调查的目的是发现Statoil ASA的潜在改进领域
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信