SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)

H. Darong, S. Menggo, M. Jelimun
{"title":"SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)","authors":"H. Darong, S. Menggo, M. Jelimun","doi":"10.31000/nyimak.v6i2.6608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is concerned with discourse semantic analysis of three selected victory speeches of the US Presidents. It was conducted for and aimed at describing, explaining, and analyzing the field, the interpersonal meaning (tenor) the mode of the texts, the schematic structure, and the unity of the texts by using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) as the basis of analysis. The speech texts were changed into clauses and then analyzed. The results of the analysis found that the register category of field is similar. The transitivity patterns of the grammar, reference, and lexical string analysis share common features that is the realization of experiential action done by the speaker and audience for the progress of America. The interpersonal meaning of the texts is slightly different, in which, Joe Biden and Barack Obama established an intimate relationship with the audience, while in Donald trump’s text, the sense of intimacy and the distance with the audience are far. Since the nominal groups used were simple, the mode of all texts belongs to the spoken mode. Besides, In terms of schematic structure, the texts were constructed similarly consisting of an introduction, body, and conclusion. Finally, this study also found that the anaphoric reference which was predominantly used, a good pattern of conjunction relations, and lexical relations between lexical items appearing cross clauses categorize the texts as being highly cohesive.","PeriodicalId":308886,"journal":{"name":"Nyimak: Journal of Communication","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nyimak: Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v6i2.6608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is concerned with discourse semantic analysis of three selected victory speeches of the US Presidents. It was conducted for and aimed at describing, explaining, and analyzing the field, the interpersonal meaning (tenor) the mode of the texts, the schematic structure, and the unity of the texts by using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) as the basis of analysis. The speech texts were changed into clauses and then analyzed. The results of the analysis found that the register category of field is similar. The transitivity patterns of the grammar, reference, and lexical string analysis share common features that is the realization of experiential action done by the speaker and audience for the progress of America. The interpersonal meaning of the texts is slightly different, in which, Joe Biden and Barack Obama established an intimate relationship with the audience, while in Donald trump’s text, the sense of intimacy and the distance with the audience are far. Since the nominal groups used were simple, the mode of all texts belongs to the spoken mode. Besides, In terms of schematic structure, the texts were constructed similarly consisting of an introduction, body, and conclusion. Finally, this study also found that the anaphoric reference which was predominantly used, a good pattern of conjunction relations, and lexical relations between lexical items appearing cross clauses categorize the texts as being highly cohesive.
言语分析(基于系统功能语言学理论的语篇语义分析)
本研究选取了三位美国总统的胜选演说进行语篇语义分析。以系统功能语言学为分析基础,对语篇的场域、语篇的人际意义、语篇的模式、语篇的图式结构和语篇的统一性进行描述、解释和分析。将演讲文本转化为子句进行分析。分析结果发现,域的寄存器类别是相似的。语法、指称和词汇串分析的及物性模式都有一个共同的特点,那就是讲话者和听众对美国进步所做的经验行动的实现。文本的人际意义略有不同,拜登和奥巴马与观众建立了亲密的关系,而特朗普的文本中,与观众的亲密感和距离都很远。由于所使用的名义群比较简单,所以所有文本的模式都属于口语模式。此外,在图式结构上,文本结构相似,由引言、正文和结论组成。最后,本研究还发现,主要使用的回指参照、良好的连词关系模式以及跨句出现的词汇项之间的词汇关系将语篇归类为高衔接语篇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信