From Slavery to Aid: politics, labour, and ecology in the Nigerien Sahel, 1800–2000 by Benedetta Rossi (review)

G. Mann
{"title":"From Slavery to Aid: politics, labour, and ecology in the Nigerien Sahel, 1800–2000 by Benedetta Rossi (review)","authors":"G. Mann","doi":"10.1017/S0001972016000772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By putting in the same phrase two phenomena usually considered to be chronologically and conceptually distinct, the title of Benedetta Rossi’s From Slavery to Aid expresses the signal contribution of this compelling work. The product of some twenty years of research in Ader – roughly the southern half of the contemporary Nigerien administrative region of Tahoua – Rossi’s book makes multiple, linked arguments that are not quite accurately captured in its subtitle, Politics, labour, and ecology in the Nigerien Sahel. Nor can they be readily encapsulated in a single review. That said, the book’s central question is why, in this area of the Sahara-Sahel, slavery has proven so resilient and a transformation in labour so elusive in the context of scarcity and ecological adversity. The question, and indeed the circumstance, is particular to the region, which is in turn largely defined by its ecology. Ader straddles the sharp edge of the Sahel. Rain-fed agriculture is feasible, but hardly profitable. Herders practise transhumance. Apart from long-distance trade, which absorbs relatively little labour, there is no productive activity that would support a sustainable wage. In the twentieth century, migration became the clear alternative to penury, particularly given the relatively high wages available in Nigeria, but nearly all migrants were male. In short, labourers are available – in a region in which the population has grown rapidly without ever becoming dense – yet labour is unobtainable or unprofitable. How to square this circle? Coercion. Such coercion, it turns out, has a complex history in Ader. Before the French conquest, local forms of governmentality – a Foucaultian concept to which Rossi is indebted but not wedded – relied on the control of movement rather than of territory. Rossi contrasts this practice of governing mobility, which she terms ‘kinetocracy’, with French ideas of government that were territorially bound, linking populations to specific locales. Through World War I, the former model prevailed. Tuareg ‘chiefs’ of the Iwellemmeden Kel Denneg and Kel Gress, who mastered both mobility and the means of violence, demanded ready access to the scarce resources of sedentary Hausa and Asna communities. They extracted from the peasantry more or less at will, but had little else at stake in the ability of those communities to reproduce themselves. After a brutal (and late) military conquest of the region, French colonizers followed much the same pattern. In a difficult environment very weakly penetrated by capital, they procured labour and extracted resources by force, irrespective of the supposed end of slavery. In short, facing similar ecological constraints but drawing on two distinct governing ideologies, Tuareg chiefs and French officers pursued much the same solution. That began to change in 1946, when such long-standing practices were thrown into question by the abolition of the colonial administrative ‘code’ known as the indigénat, which Rossi presents (reductively in my view) as primarily a tool for procuring labour. A new form of ‘developmentalist government’ slowly emerged. In the decades to come, the anticipated transition from slavery to some form of waged labour never took place. Rather, in keeping with President Seyni Kountché’s vision of Niger as a ‘development society’, the aid industry became rooted in Ader. Locally, it took the form of an Italian development initiative known as the Keita project, to which Rossi devotes an illuminating Africa 87 (1) 2017: 211–32","PeriodicalId":337749,"journal":{"name":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972016000772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By putting in the same phrase two phenomena usually considered to be chronologically and conceptually distinct, the title of Benedetta Rossi’s From Slavery to Aid expresses the signal contribution of this compelling work. The product of some twenty years of research in Ader – roughly the southern half of the contemporary Nigerien administrative region of Tahoua – Rossi’s book makes multiple, linked arguments that are not quite accurately captured in its subtitle, Politics, labour, and ecology in the Nigerien Sahel. Nor can they be readily encapsulated in a single review. That said, the book’s central question is why, in this area of the Sahara-Sahel, slavery has proven so resilient and a transformation in labour so elusive in the context of scarcity and ecological adversity. The question, and indeed the circumstance, is particular to the region, which is in turn largely defined by its ecology. Ader straddles the sharp edge of the Sahel. Rain-fed agriculture is feasible, but hardly profitable. Herders practise transhumance. Apart from long-distance trade, which absorbs relatively little labour, there is no productive activity that would support a sustainable wage. In the twentieth century, migration became the clear alternative to penury, particularly given the relatively high wages available in Nigeria, but nearly all migrants were male. In short, labourers are available – in a region in which the population has grown rapidly without ever becoming dense – yet labour is unobtainable or unprofitable. How to square this circle? Coercion. Such coercion, it turns out, has a complex history in Ader. Before the French conquest, local forms of governmentality – a Foucaultian concept to which Rossi is indebted but not wedded – relied on the control of movement rather than of territory. Rossi contrasts this practice of governing mobility, which she terms ‘kinetocracy’, with French ideas of government that were territorially bound, linking populations to specific locales. Through World War I, the former model prevailed. Tuareg ‘chiefs’ of the Iwellemmeden Kel Denneg and Kel Gress, who mastered both mobility and the means of violence, demanded ready access to the scarce resources of sedentary Hausa and Asna communities. They extracted from the peasantry more or less at will, but had little else at stake in the ability of those communities to reproduce themselves. After a brutal (and late) military conquest of the region, French colonizers followed much the same pattern. In a difficult environment very weakly penetrated by capital, they procured labour and extracted resources by force, irrespective of the supposed end of slavery. In short, facing similar ecological constraints but drawing on two distinct governing ideologies, Tuareg chiefs and French officers pursued much the same solution. That began to change in 1946, when such long-standing practices were thrown into question by the abolition of the colonial administrative ‘code’ known as the indigénat, which Rossi presents (reductively in my view) as primarily a tool for procuring labour. A new form of ‘developmentalist government’ slowly emerged. In the decades to come, the anticipated transition from slavery to some form of waged labour never took place. Rather, in keeping with President Seyni Kountché’s vision of Niger as a ‘development society’, the aid industry became rooted in Ader. Locally, it took the form of an Italian development initiative known as the Keita project, to which Rossi devotes an illuminating Africa 87 (1) 2017: 211–32
从奴隶制到援助:尼日尔萨赫勒地区的政治、劳工和生态,1800-2000
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信