Guidelines and Limitations of the Compact Compression Specimen

David J. Plechaty, K. Carpenter, J. Parmigiani
{"title":"Guidelines and Limitations of the Compact Compression Specimen","authors":"David J. Plechaty, K. Carpenter, J. Parmigiani","doi":"10.1115/imece2019-11713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Damage initiation and propagation material models for carbon fiber composites can be categorized according to the loading applied to constituent components. An example of such categorization is fiber tension, fiber compression, matrix tension, and matrix compression material models. Of these, matrix compression has been by far the least studied based on amount of published literature. Recent work at Oregon State University (OSU) has begun to address this lack of study. OSU researchers have published several papers culminating in the specification of an effective test specimen for isolating matrix compression damage initiation and propagation in carbon fiber laminates. While providing compelling results indicating the effectiveness and usefulness of this test specimen, little or no information has been provided regarding its manufacture, usable notch lengths, and optimum loading rate during testing. Experience at OSU has shown that this information is critical and not trivial to obtain. The purpose of this paper is to provide specific guidelines and “lessons learned” needed for other researchers to efficiently and effectively use this specimen in a comprehensive study. Test specimens are manufactured in the OSU Composites Materials Manufacturing Laboratory using typical commercial pre-peg carbon fiber following the specified layup and curing procedures. Once the material was cured the carbon fiber plate was then water-jet cut into the desired geometry and notch length. Usable notch length and optimum loading rate was determined by testing a series of specimens. All testing was conducted at an OSU lab using a universal testing machine with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) data collected. Specimens were preloaded and matrix compression initiation and propagation data collected until tensile failure occurred on the back edge of the specimen. Testing showed that shorter notch lengths result in inconsistent data and longer in effective initiation but limited propagation due to reduced ligament length. Testing suggested that a speed less than 5 mm/min gave the best results as faster displacement rates caused less crack propagation to occur, while increasing the likelihood of the specimen to fail in tension along its back edge. Through the use of these guidelines, researchers are able to manufacture and use an effective test specimen for the investigation of matrix compression damage initiation and propagation.","PeriodicalId":375383,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9: Mechanics of Solids, Structures, and Fluids","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9: Mechanics of Solids, Structures, and Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2019-11713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Damage initiation and propagation material models for carbon fiber composites can be categorized according to the loading applied to constituent components. An example of such categorization is fiber tension, fiber compression, matrix tension, and matrix compression material models. Of these, matrix compression has been by far the least studied based on amount of published literature. Recent work at Oregon State University (OSU) has begun to address this lack of study. OSU researchers have published several papers culminating in the specification of an effective test specimen for isolating matrix compression damage initiation and propagation in carbon fiber laminates. While providing compelling results indicating the effectiveness and usefulness of this test specimen, little or no information has been provided regarding its manufacture, usable notch lengths, and optimum loading rate during testing. Experience at OSU has shown that this information is critical and not trivial to obtain. The purpose of this paper is to provide specific guidelines and “lessons learned” needed for other researchers to efficiently and effectively use this specimen in a comprehensive study. Test specimens are manufactured in the OSU Composites Materials Manufacturing Laboratory using typical commercial pre-peg carbon fiber following the specified layup and curing procedures. Once the material was cured the carbon fiber plate was then water-jet cut into the desired geometry and notch length. Usable notch length and optimum loading rate was determined by testing a series of specimens. All testing was conducted at an OSU lab using a universal testing machine with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) data collected. Specimens were preloaded and matrix compression initiation and propagation data collected until tensile failure occurred on the back edge of the specimen. Testing showed that shorter notch lengths result in inconsistent data and longer in effective initiation but limited propagation due to reduced ligament length. Testing suggested that a speed less than 5 mm/min gave the best results as faster displacement rates caused less crack propagation to occur, while increasing the likelihood of the specimen to fail in tension along its back edge. Through the use of these guidelines, researchers are able to manufacture and use an effective test specimen for the investigation of matrix compression damage initiation and propagation.
致密压缩试样的指南和限制
碳纤维复合材料的损伤起裂和损伤扩展模型可根据构件所受载荷的大小进行分类。这种分类的一个例子是纤维张力、纤维压缩、基体张力和基体压缩材料模型。其中,基于已发表的文献数量,矩阵压缩是迄今为止研究最少的。俄勒冈州立大学(OSU)最近的工作已经开始解决这一缺乏研究的问题。俄勒冈州立大学的研究人员发表了几篇论文,最终确定了一种有效的测试样品,用于隔离碳纤维层压板中基体压缩损伤的产生和传播。虽然提供了令人信服的结果,表明该测试样品的有效性和有用性,但很少或没有提供关于其制造,可用缺口长度和测试期间的最佳加载率的信息。俄勒冈州立大学的经验表明,获得这些信息是至关重要的,而且不是微不足道的。本文的目的是为其他研究人员提供具体的指导方针和“经验教训”,以便在综合研究中高效有效地使用该标本。测试样品是在俄勒冈州立大学复合材料制造实验室使用典型的商业预钉碳纤维按照规定的铺层和固化程序制造的。一旦材料固化,碳纤维板就被水射流切割成所需的几何形状和缺口长度。通过一系列试件的试验,确定了可用缺口长度和最佳加载速率。所有测试都是在俄勒冈州立大学的实验室进行的,使用了一台通用的测试机器,收集了数字图像相关(DIC)数据。预加载试样,收集基体压缩起始和扩展数据,直至试样后缘发生拉伸破坏。试验表明,切迹长度较短导致数据不一致,有效起始时间较长,但由于韧带长度缩短而限制了传播。试验表明,低于5毫米/分钟的速度可以获得最好的结果,因为更快的位移速率可以减少裂纹扩展的发生,同时增加了试样在后边缘拉伸时失效的可能性。通过使用这些准则,研究人员能够制造和使用有效的试样来研究基体压缩损伤的发生和扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信