{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Credit Card Fraud Detection using Logistic regression with Random Forest towards an Increase in Accuracy of Prediction","authors":"M. Krishna, J. Praveenchandar","doi":"10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to identify the frauds committed using a payment card such as credit cards, debit cards, and also an experiment is performed to find the best suitable algorithm among Random forest and Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: To stop the fraud detections using Random forest (N=10) and Logistic regression (N=10) with supervised learning that gives insights from the previous data. Results: The precision of the random forest is 76.29% compared with Logistic regression with accuracy of 74.65% with statistical significance value p=0.03 (p<0.05) using Independent sample t test. Conclusion: This results proved that Random forest was significantly better for Fraud detection than Logistic regression within the study’s limits.","PeriodicalId":273850,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
The study aims to identify the frauds committed using a payment card such as credit cards, debit cards, and also an experiment is performed to find the best suitable algorithm among Random forest and Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: To stop the fraud detections using Random forest (N=10) and Logistic regression (N=10) with supervised learning that gives insights from the previous data. Results: The precision of the random forest is 76.29% compared with Logistic regression with accuracy of 74.65% with statistical significance value p=0.03 (p<0.05) using Independent sample t test. Conclusion: This results proved that Random forest was significantly better for Fraud detection than Logistic regression within the study’s limits.