{"title":"Environmental, Social And Governance (ESG): A Bibliometric Review Study","authors":"Thiago de Luca Ribeiro, Anderson Antônio de Lima","doi":"10.37497/esg.v6i1.1571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to map and analyze the main basic and frontier theoretical currents about international research in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG). Additionally, we also analyzed which authors, journals and countries are most active in international ESG research. \nMethod: We performed a bibliometric analysis focused on co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis, with exploratory factor analysis techniques and graphic mapping through clustering. Our sample included 405 articles published until December 2021 and indexed in the Web of Science database. \nResults: Through co-citation analysis, we identified 5 research streams, being a) Influence of Organizational Theories on ESG; b) Organizational competitiveness; c) Impact of ESG on financial performance; d) Corporate Social Responsibility; and e) Stakeholder Theory. Through the pairing analysis, we identified 6 theoretical frontier currents, namely: a) sustainable investments; b) Transparency and administrative council; c) Effects of ESG; d) Relationships between financial performance and corporate social performance; e) Relationship between shareholders and ESG; and f) Risks and ESG. \nOriginality: As far as we know, this is the most complete bibliometric study on ESG research, covering both basic and frontier theoretical currents. \nTheoretical/methodological contributions: We identify in this work 5 theoretical currents that helped to found and develop ESG research as a scientific (historical) field and point out 6 emerging theoretical currents that help to understand where ESG research is advancing today (border).","PeriodicalId":440308,"journal":{"name":"ESG Law Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESG Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37497/esg.v6i1.1571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to map and analyze the main basic and frontier theoretical currents about international research in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG). Additionally, we also analyzed which authors, journals and countries are most active in international ESG research.
Method: We performed a bibliometric analysis focused on co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis, with exploratory factor analysis techniques and graphic mapping through clustering. Our sample included 405 articles published until December 2021 and indexed in the Web of Science database.
Results: Through co-citation analysis, we identified 5 research streams, being a) Influence of Organizational Theories on ESG; b) Organizational competitiveness; c) Impact of ESG on financial performance; d) Corporate Social Responsibility; and e) Stakeholder Theory. Through the pairing analysis, we identified 6 theoretical frontier currents, namely: a) sustainable investments; b) Transparency and administrative council; c) Effects of ESG; d) Relationships between financial performance and corporate social performance; e) Relationship between shareholders and ESG; and f) Risks and ESG.
Originality: As far as we know, this is the most complete bibliometric study on ESG research, covering both basic and frontier theoretical currents.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: We identify in this work 5 theoretical currents that helped to found and develop ESG research as a scientific (historical) field and point out 6 emerging theoretical currents that help to understand where ESG research is advancing today (border).
目的:对环境、社会与治理(ESG)领域国际研究的主要基础和前沿理论趋势进行梳理和分析。此外,我们还分析了哪些作者、期刊和国家在国际ESG研究中最活跃。方法:采用探索性因子分析技术和聚类图绘制方法,对共被引文献进行计量分析和文献耦合分析。我们的样本包括在2021年12月之前发表的405篇文章,并在Web of Science数据库中被索引。结果:通过共引分析,我们确定了5个研究方向,分别是:a)组织理论对ESG的影响;b)组织竞争力;c) ESG对财务绩效的影响;d)企业社会责任;e)利益相关者理论。通过配对分析,我们确定了6个理论前沿趋势,即:a)可持续投资;b)透明度和行政理事会;c) ESG的效果;d)财务绩效与企业社会绩效的关系;e)股东与ESG的关系;f)风险与ESG。原创性:据我们所知,这是ESG研究中最完整的文献计量学研究,涵盖了基础理论和前沿理论。理论/方法贡献:我们在本著作中确定了5种理论潮流,这些理论潮流有助于将ESG研究建立和发展为一个科学(历史)领域,并指出了6种新兴的理论潮流,这些理论潮流有助于理解当今ESG研究的发展方向(边界)。