Konstruksi Epistemologi Fikih Pandemik: Analisis Fatwa-Fatwa MUI

Ilyas Supena
{"title":"Konstruksi Epistemologi Fikih Pandemik: Analisis Fatwa-Fatwa MUI","authors":"Ilyas Supena","doi":"10.24090/mnh.v15i1.4203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 pandemic has changed the behavior of people in the world, both in social, political, cultural and religious practices. The practice of strict health protocols has changed religious practices, both in Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and other faiths. In Islamic countries or countries where the population is predominantly Muslim, the ulama play an important role in legitimizing these changes in religious practice. In Indonesia, there is the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) which plays a role in providing fatwas related to changes in religious practices, such as prayer, zakat, Hajj and burying people who died due to being infected with Covid-19. These fatwas raise the issue of the epistemological construction that underlies the fatwas. Through a philosophical approach and content analysis of the MUI fatwas products, it was found that MUI fatwas were based more on empirical-scientific arguments (burhani) as well as ethical principles of Islamic teachings contained in the principles of maslahah (general good) and syadz al-zari'ah (avoiding danger). This article shows that the legal reasoning built by MUI shows the tendency of epistemology with a realism style based on scientific facts so that religion plays a role in providing legitimacy in the ethical and moral realm in the form of sharia objectives (maqāshid al-syarī’ah).","PeriodicalId":215937,"journal":{"name":"Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i1.4203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has changed the behavior of people in the world, both in social, political, cultural and religious practices. The practice of strict health protocols has changed religious practices, both in Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and other faiths. In Islamic countries or countries where the population is predominantly Muslim, the ulama play an important role in legitimizing these changes in religious practice. In Indonesia, there is the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) which plays a role in providing fatwas related to changes in religious practices, such as prayer, zakat, Hajj and burying people who died due to being infected with Covid-19. These fatwas raise the issue of the epistemological construction that underlies the fatwas. Through a philosophical approach and content analysis of the MUI fatwas products, it was found that MUI fatwas were based more on empirical-scientific arguments (burhani) as well as ethical principles of Islamic teachings contained in the principles of maslahah (general good) and syadz al-zari'ah (avoiding danger). This article shows that the legal reasoning built by MUI shows the tendency of epistemology with a realism style based on scientific facts so that religion plays a role in providing legitimacy in the ethical and moral realm in the form of sharia objectives (maqāshid al-syarī’ah).
海啸学的认识论结构:梅的fatwa分析
新冠肺炎大流行改变了世界各国人民的社会、政治、文化和宗教习俗。严格的健康协议已经改变了伊斯兰教、基督教、印度教、佛教和其他信仰的宗教习俗。在伊斯兰国家或人口以穆斯林为主的国家,乌拉玛在使宗教实践中的这些变化合法化方面发挥着重要作用。在印度尼西亚,有印尼乌里玛委员会(Indonesian Ulema Council, MUI),负责提供与宗教习俗变化有关的教令,如祈祷、天课、朝觐和埋葬因感染新冠病毒而死亡的人。这些教令提出了作为教令基础的认识论建构问题。通过对伊斯兰教法特瓦产品的哲学方法和内容分析,我们发现伊斯兰教法特瓦更多地基于经验科学论证(burhani)以及伊斯兰教义的伦理原则,这些原则包含在maslahah(普遍善)和syadz al-zari'ah(避免危险)原则中。本文表明,MUI建立的法律推理显示出以科学事实为基础的现实主义风格的认识论倾向,使宗教以伊斯兰教法目标的形式在伦理和道德领域发挥合法性作用(maqÄ´shid al-syarÄ«€™ah)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信