Effect of Magnesium Sulfate on the Total Anesthetic and Analgesic Requirements in Neurosurgery

E. Manaa, A. Alhabib
{"title":"Effect of Magnesium Sulfate on the Total Anesthetic and Analgesic Requirements in Neurosurgery","authors":"E. Manaa, A. Alhabib","doi":"10.4172/2155-9562.S11-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The intraoperative anesthetic and postoperative analgesic requirements are of great importance especially in neurosurgical anesthesia. This requires balancing a deep and effective anesthesia and postoperative analgesia versus the risks of delayed recovery and postoperative respiratory depression from excessive analgesics. Magnesium sulfate is an antagonist of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptors in a voltage-dependent fashion. Propofol also inhibits the NMDA subtype of the glutamate receptor. Therefore, magnesium sulfate when coadministered with propofol potentiates anesthetic effect and NMDA antagonism of propofol. Majority of the studies that evaluated the anesthetic and analgesic requirement in patients receiving magnesium sulfate depended on the clinical parameters, for example, hemodynamic parameters and measurement of pain scores. In this study, we added bispectral index (BIS) and neuromuscular monitoring using train-of-four (TOF) to adjust intraoperative anesthetic requirements in addition to the clinical parameters. \nMethodology: This randomized controlled double-blind study included 50 adult ASA I and II male and female patients undergoing neurosurgical maneuvers. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Routine intraoperative monitoring including invasive BP and in addition TOF and BIS were applied. In a blind fashion, patient in group I (Magnesium group) received magnesium sulfate 20 mg/kg as bolus dose over 5 min followed by 0.1 ml/kg/hr of 10% solution as infusion, while patient in group II (Control group) received saline with the same bolus and infusion rates after the induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced in both groups by fentanyl 2 µg/kg, propofol 1.5–2 mg/kg, and rocuronium in a dose of 0.6 mg/kg to facilitate ETT insertion. This is followed by continuous infusion of propofol 6–10 mg/kg/hr and fentanyl 1–2 mic/kg/hr. The parameters which were assessed included hemodynamic parameters (HR and BP), TOF, and BIS. Total consumptions of propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, and postoperative analgesic requirements (PCA morphine) were recorded. In addition, recovery time and postoperative pain score by visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded. \nResult: There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the two groups. As regard the hemodynamic changes and BIS, no significant difference was seen between the two groups except the HR change which was significantly reduced (p = 0.005) with surgical stimulation in group I compared to the other group. Results also showed that the mean fentanyl, propofol, and rocuronium consumption, recovery time, degree of postoperative pain, and postoperative analgesic requirements were significantly less in patients that received magnesium sulfate infusion compared to those in the control group. \nConclusion: Magnesium sulfate is most likely a safe and cost-effective supplement to the general anesthesia in neurosurgery as it reduces the total anesthetic and analgesic requirements and postoperative pain.","PeriodicalId":199836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9562.S11-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Introduction: The intraoperative anesthetic and postoperative analgesic requirements are of great importance especially in neurosurgical anesthesia. This requires balancing a deep and effective anesthesia and postoperative analgesia versus the risks of delayed recovery and postoperative respiratory depression from excessive analgesics. Magnesium sulfate is an antagonist of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptors in a voltage-dependent fashion. Propofol also inhibits the NMDA subtype of the glutamate receptor. Therefore, magnesium sulfate when coadministered with propofol potentiates anesthetic effect and NMDA antagonism of propofol. Majority of the studies that evaluated the anesthetic and analgesic requirement in patients receiving magnesium sulfate depended on the clinical parameters, for example, hemodynamic parameters and measurement of pain scores. In this study, we added bispectral index (BIS) and neuromuscular monitoring using train-of-four (TOF) to adjust intraoperative anesthetic requirements in addition to the clinical parameters. Methodology: This randomized controlled double-blind study included 50 adult ASA I and II male and female patients undergoing neurosurgical maneuvers. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Routine intraoperative monitoring including invasive BP and in addition TOF and BIS were applied. In a blind fashion, patient in group I (Magnesium group) received magnesium sulfate 20 mg/kg as bolus dose over 5 min followed by 0.1 ml/kg/hr of 10% solution as infusion, while patient in group II (Control group) received saline with the same bolus and infusion rates after the induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced in both groups by fentanyl 2 µg/kg, propofol 1.5–2 mg/kg, and rocuronium in a dose of 0.6 mg/kg to facilitate ETT insertion. This is followed by continuous infusion of propofol 6–10 mg/kg/hr and fentanyl 1–2 mic/kg/hr. The parameters which were assessed included hemodynamic parameters (HR and BP), TOF, and BIS. Total consumptions of propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, and postoperative analgesic requirements (PCA morphine) were recorded. In addition, recovery time and postoperative pain score by visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded. Result: There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the two groups. As regard the hemodynamic changes and BIS, no significant difference was seen between the two groups except the HR change which was significantly reduced (p = 0.005) with surgical stimulation in group I compared to the other group. Results also showed that the mean fentanyl, propofol, and rocuronium consumption, recovery time, degree of postoperative pain, and postoperative analgesic requirements were significantly less in patients that received magnesium sulfate infusion compared to those in the control group. Conclusion: Magnesium sulfate is most likely a safe and cost-effective supplement to the general anesthesia in neurosurgery as it reduces the total anesthetic and analgesic requirements and postoperative pain.
硫酸镁对神经外科全麻镇痛需求的影响
术中麻醉和术后镇痛的要求是非常重要的,特别是在神经外科麻醉中。这需要在深度和有效的麻醉和术后镇痛与过度镇痛延迟恢复和术后呼吸抑制的风险之间取得平衡。硫酸镁是一种电压依赖性的n -甲基-d -天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂。异丙酚也抑制谷氨酸受体的NMDA亚型。因此,硫酸镁与异丙酚共给药可增强异丙酚的麻醉作用和NMDA拮抗作用。大多数评估硫酸镁患者麻醉和镇痛需求的研究依赖于临床参数,例如血流动力学参数和疼痛评分的测量。在本研究中,除了临床参数外,我们还增加了双谱指数(BIS)和四训练(TOF)神经肌肉监测来调整术中麻醉需求。方法:这项随机对照双盲研究包括50名接受神经外科手术的成年ASA I和II型男性和女性患者。患者被随机分为两组。术中常规监测包括有创血压、TOF和BIS。ⅰ组(镁组)患者采用盲法,在麻醉诱导后给予硫酸镁20 mg/kg为丸剂,5 min后再以10%溶液0.1 ml/kg/hr输注;ⅱ组(对照组)患者以相同的丸剂和输注速率给予生理盐水。两组均采用芬太尼2µg/kg、异丙酚1.5 ~ 2 mg/kg、罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg的剂量诱导麻醉,以方便ETT的插入。随后持续输注异丙酚6 - 10mg /kg/hr和芬太尼1 - 2mic /kg/hr。评估的参数包括血流动力学参数(HR和BP)、TOF和BIS。记录丙泊酚、芬太尼、罗库溴铵的总用量和术后镇痛药(PCA吗啡)用量。并记录两组患者恢复时间及术后疼痛评分(VAS)。结果:两组患者的临床特征无明显差异。在血流动力学变化和BIS方面,两组之间无显著差异,但HR变化在手术刺激下明显降低(p = 0.005)。结果还显示,与对照组相比,接受硫酸镁输注的患者芬太尼、异丙酚和罗库溴铵的平均用量、恢复时间、术后疼痛程度和术后镇痛需求均显著减少。结论:硫酸镁是神经外科全麻的一种安全、经济的补充,因为硫酸镁减少了全身麻醉和镇痛需求,减少了术后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信